PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOV vs. ET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOV vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (NOV) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOV achieves a 24.07% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 26.82% return. Over the past 10 years, NOV has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -4.36%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.


NOV

1D
1.27%
1M
-9.47%
6M
12.55%
YTD
24.07%
1Y
43.22%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
-4.36%

ET

1D
2.64%
1M
5.82%
6M
21.94%
YTD
26.82%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
25.65%
5Y*
24.33%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOV vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOV
National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
24.07%11.30%-26.81%-1.83%55.72%-0.89%-44.93%-1.69%-28.28%-3.23%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
26.82%-9.37%53.87%27.87%55.74%42.96%-44.92%5.88%-17.74%-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between NOV and ET is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006

0.43

The correlation between NOV and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOV:

$6.87B

ET:

$69.44B

EPS

NOV:

$0.25

ET:

$1.35

PE Ratio

NOV:

77.22

ET:

14.96

PS Ratio

NOV:

0.81

ET:

0.81

PB Ratio

NOV:

1.11

ET:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOV:

$8.69B

ET:

$89.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOV:

$1.70B

ET:

$20.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOV:

$633.00M

ET:

$13.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOV vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOV
NOV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
ET Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOV vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (NOV) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOVETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.87

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.28

6.24

+0.04

NOV vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the ET Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOV and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOV vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOV drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOV and ET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.77%

-87.81%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.71%

-8.59%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.15%

-24.56%

-22.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.70%

-24.56%

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.26%

-72.82%

-10.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.16%

-1.03%

-72.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.27%

-25.65%

-19.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.95%

3.94%

+3.01%

Volatility

NOV vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (NOV) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.66%. This indicates that NOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

5.66%

+3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.23%

12.36%

+12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.12%

16.31%

+21.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.00%

24.61%

+17.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.13%

34.33%

+12.80%

Dividends

NOV vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

NOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than ET's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ET
Energy Transfer LP
6.62%7.97%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%
NOV
National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
2.20%3.26%1.88%0.99%0.96%0.37%0.36%0.80%0.78%0.56%1.63%5.49%

Financials

NOV vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.05B
27.77B
(NOV) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOV vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.5%
23.9%
Portfolio components
NOV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, National Oilwell Varco, Inc. reported a gross profit of 379.00M and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

NOV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, National Oilwell Varco, Inc. reported an operating income of 47.00M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

NOV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, National Oilwell Varco, Inc. reported a net income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOV and ET have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOV has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ET (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOV dropped -89.77% vs ET's -87.81%.

ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOV and ET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer