PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NORW vs. EWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NORW vs. EWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly higher than EWO's 16.61% return. Over the past 10 years, NORW has underperformed EWO with an annualized return of 9.67%, while EWO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.21% annualized return.


NORW

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
26.97%
6M
34.10%
1Y
35.24%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
9.67%

EWO

1D
1.05%
1M
6.00%
YTD
16.61%
6M
23.65%
1Y
44.58%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*
14.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NORW vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.97%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
16.61%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%52.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NORW and EWO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2009

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between NORW and EWO has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NORW vs. EWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NORW
EWO

Energy

29.4%
10.8%

Financial Services

22.6%
46.6%

Industrials

13.3%
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

12.5%

-

Basic Materials

10.9%
8.1%

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Technology

4.1%
6.6%

Utilities

0.7%
7.5%

Real Estate

0.4%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
1.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Energy

NORW
29.4%
EWO
10.8%

Financial Services

NORW
22.6%
EWO
46.6%

Industrials

NORW
13.3%
EWO
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

NORW
12.5%
EWO

-

Basic Materials

NORW
10.9%
EWO
8.1%

Communication Services

NORW
5.9%
EWO

-

Technology

NORW
4.1%
EWO
6.6%

Utilities

NORW
0.7%
EWO
7.5%

Real Estate

NORW
0.4%
EWO
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NORW
0.2%
EWO
1.9%

Healthcare

NORW

-

EWO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NORW vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NORW vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NORWEWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

2.43

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

3.34

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

3.32

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.03

11.30

+0.73

NORW vs. EWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NORW Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the EWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NORW and EWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NORWEWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.43

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.70

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.62

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.28

+0.13

Drawdowns

NORW vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and EWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NORWEWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-75.69%

+40.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-14.08%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-16.75%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.78%

-41.82%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.86%

-58.10%

+24.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

0.00%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-28.13%

+18.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

4.14%

-0.93%

Volatility

NORW vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) is 4.11%, while iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that NORW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NORWEWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

6.61%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

14.95%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

18.47%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

21.83%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

22.86%

-2.05%

NORW vs. EWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NORW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NORW vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison

NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than EWO's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
2.04%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.71%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NORW and EWO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWO has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to NORW (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs EWO's -75.69%.

On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 14.21% vs 9.67% for NORW. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.21% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.04% for EWO.

NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NORW and 0.49% for EWO.

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NORW and EWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer