PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWO vs. EWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWO vs. EWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 16.61% return, which is significantly higher than EWL's 3.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EWO has outperformed EWL with an annualized return of 14.21%, while EWL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.42% annualized return.


EWO

1D
1.05%
1M
6.00%
YTD
16.61%
6M
23.65%
1Y
44.58%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*
14.21%

EWL

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.78%
YTD
3.00%
6M
6.59%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWO vs. EWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
16.61%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%52.47%
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
3.00%32.92%-2.80%17.67%-18.89%20.20%11.80%31.58%-9.21%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EWO and EWL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996

0.53

The correlation between EWO and EWL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWO vs. EWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWO
EWL

Financial Services

46.6%
18.6%

Industrials

14.2%
12.0%

Energy

10.8%

-

Basic Materials

8.1%
6.6%

Utilities

7.5%
0.4%

Technology

6.6%
0.9%

Real Estate

4.4%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
5.4%

Communication Services

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.9%

Healthcare

-

38.8%

Financial Services

EWO
46.6%
EWL
18.6%

Industrials

EWO
14.2%
EWL
12.0%

Energy

EWO
10.8%
EWL

-

Basic Materials

EWO
8.1%
EWL
6.6%

Utilities

EWO
7.5%
EWL
0.4%

Technology

EWO
6.6%
EWL
0.9%

Real Estate

EWO
4.4%
EWL
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EWO
1.9%
EWL
5.4%

Communication Services

EWO

-

EWL
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

EWO

-

EWL
14.9%

Healthcare

EWO

-

EWL
38.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWO vs. EWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

EWL
EWL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWL Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWO vs. EWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWOEWLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

0.85

+1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.34

1.29

+2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.15

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

1.04

+2.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.30

3.42

+7.88

EWO vs. EWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the EWL Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWO and EWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWOEWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

0.85

+1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.43

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.57

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.35

-0.07

Drawdowns

EWO vs. EWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than EWL's maximum drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and EWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWOEWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-51.62%

-24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-13.48%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.75%

-13.48%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.82%

-28.99%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.10%

-28.99%

-29.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.10%

+5.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.13%

-11.09%

-17.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

4.11%

+0.03%

Volatility

EWO vs. EWL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) at 5.12%. This indicates that EWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWOEWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

5.12%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

12.17%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

15.66%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.83%

16.05%

+5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

16.46%

+6.40%

EWO vs. EWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWO vs. EWL - Dividend Comparison

EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than EWL's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
1.66%1.71%2.21%2.12%2.04%1.73%1.45%1.85%2.56%2.05%2.75%2.58%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
2.04%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWO and EWL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWO has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to EWL (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs EWL's -51.62%.

On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 14.21% vs 9.42% for EWL. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWL has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.21% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.

EWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.66% for EWL.

EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.50% for EWL.

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWO and EWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer