EWO vs. IBZL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L).
EWO and IBZL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. IBZL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Brazil NR USD. It was launched on Nov 18, 2005. Both EWO and IBZL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWO or IBZL.L.
Key characteristics
| EWO | IBZL.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.85% | -17.34% |
| 1Y Return | 15.23% | -11.62% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.68% | 10.94% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.43% | -0.73% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.26% | 3.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.08 | -0.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.51 | -0.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.69 | -0.61 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.66 | -1.10 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.33% | 11.21% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.34% | 19.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.69% | -69.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.88% | -18.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWO and IBZL.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EWO vs. IBZL.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly higher than IBZL.L's -17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, EWO has outperformed IBZL.L with an annualized return of 6.26%, while IBZL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWO vs. IBZL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than IBZL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWO vs. IBZL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWO vs. IBZL.L - Dividend Comparison
EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, less than IBZL.L's 8.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 7.51% | 5.65% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% | 3.93% | 2.02% |
IBZL.L iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.93% | 6.83% | 16.49% | 8.64% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 3.31% | 1.86% | 2.24% | 5.42% | 8.32% | 3.87% |
Drawdowns
EWO vs. IBZL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than IBZL.L's maximum drawdown of -69.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and IBZL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWO vs. IBZL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) is 4.79%, while iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that EWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBZL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.