NOMD vs. FLO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NOMD (Nomad Foods Limited) and FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, NOMD returned 1.00%/yr vs -5.03%/yr for FLO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NOMD vs. FLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOMD achieves a -16.87% return, which is significantly higher than FLO's -30.02% return. Over the past 10 years, NOMD has outperformed FLO with an annualized return of 1.00%, while FLO has yielded a comparatively lower -5.03% annualized return.

NOMD

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 7.82%
• YTD: -16.87%
• 6M: -14.96%
• 1Y: -38.56%
• 3Y*: -14.36%
• 5Y*: -18.58%
• 10Y*: 1.00%

FLO

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -15.02%
• YTD: -30.02%
• 6M: -28.77%
• 1Y: -51.59%
• 3Y*: -29.91%
• 5Y*: -18.15%
• 10Y*: -5.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOMD vs. FLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited	-16.87%	-22.15%	2.39%	-1.68%	-32.10%	-0.12%	13.63%	33.79%	-1.12%	76.70%
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc.	-30.02%	-43.63%	-4.34%	-18.63%	7.97%	25.63%	7.73%	21.80%	-0.93%	0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NOMD and FLO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.29

The correlation between NOMD and FLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap NOMD : $1.43B FLO : $1.58B
EPS NOMD : $0.91 FLO : $0.66
PE Ratio NOMD : 11.10 FLO : 11.22
PS Ratio NOMD : 0.49 FLO : 0.64
PB Ratio NOMD : 0.57 FLO : 1.21
Total Revenue (TTM) NOMD : $3.00B FLO : $2.47B
Gross Profit (TTM) NOMD : $798.02M FLO : $1.19B
EBITDA (TTM) NOMD : $343.69M FLO : $289.47M

Return for Risk

NOMD vs. FLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOMD

NOMD Risk / Return Rank: 6
NOMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NOMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NOMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NOMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
NOMD Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FLO

FLO Risk / Return Rank: 2
FLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
FLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FLO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FLO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOMD vs. FLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOMD	FLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.25	-1.50	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.85	-2.55	+0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	0.70	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	-0.95	+0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-1.66	+0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOMD vs. FLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOMD Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is comparable to the FLO Sharpe Ratio of -1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOMD and FLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOMD	FLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.25	-1.50	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.64	-0.74	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	-0.20	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.17	-0.20

Drawdowns

NOMD vs. FLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOMD drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, smaller than the maximum FLO drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOMD and FLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOMD	FLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.99%	-72.29%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.12%	-55.34%	+8.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.77%	-68.82%	+16.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.99%	-72.29%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.99%	-72.29%	+4.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.50%	-70.71%	+6.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.22%	-20.59%	-4.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.81%	31.59%	-0.78%

Volatility

NOMD vs. FLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is 15.13%, while Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that NOMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOMD	FLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.13%	17.01%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.21%	28.69%	-4.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.07%	34.41%	-3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.21%	24.71%	+4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.71%	25.10%	+3.61%

Dividends

NOMD vs. FLO - Dividend Comparison

NOMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, less than FLO's 13.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc.	13.36%	9.03%	4.60%	4.04%	3.03%	3.02%	3.49%	3.45%	3.84%	3.47%	3.13%	2.64%
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited	6.75%	5.44%	3.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

NOMD vs. FLO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nomad Foods Limited and Flowers Foods, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NOMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a gross profit of 186.62M and revenue of 726.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.7%.

FLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of -559.92M and revenue of -1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.

NOMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported an operating income of 67.70M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.

FLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -69.09M and revenue of -1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

NOMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a net income of 29.38M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

FLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a net income of 109.13M and revenue of -1.23B, resulting in a net margin of -8.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOMD and FLO in my portfolio?

NOMD and FLO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOMD or FLO?

FLO has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to NOMD (15.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOMD dropped -67.99% vs FLO's -72.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.25 vs -1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.