NOMD vs. TBB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NOMD (Nomad Foods Limited) and TBB (AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66) are both stocks. Over the past 5 years, NOMD returned -17.08%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for TBB. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NOMD vs. TBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOMD achieves a -18.51% return, which is significantly lower than TBB's -5.00% return.

NOMD

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -3.80%
• YTD: -18.51%
• 6M: -18.97%
• 1Y: -38.68%
• 3Y*: -14.32%
• 5Y*: -17.08%
• 10Y*: 2.01%

TBB

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: -5.00%
• 6M: -5.17%
• 1Y: -2.85%
• 3Y*: 1.13%
• 5Y*: 0.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOMD vs. TBB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited	-18.51%	-22.15%	2.39%	-1.68%	-32.10%	-0.12%	13.63%	33.79%	-1.12%	11.62%
TBB AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66	-5.00%	-3.34%	10.14%	14.65%	-12.18%	-0.72%	7.21%	26.60%	-9.95%	3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between NOMD and TBB is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.16

The correlation between NOMD and TBB shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS NOMD : €0.91 TBB : $3.04
PE Ratio NOMD : 9.52 TBB : 6.74
PEG Ratio NOMD : 15.36 TBB : 0.28
PS Ratio NOMD : 0.42 TBB : 1.17
Total Revenue (TTM) NOMD : €3.00B TBB : $125.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) NOMD : €798.02M TBB : $105.41B
EBITDA (TTM) NOMD : €343.69M TBB : $54.70B

Return for Risk

NOMD vs. TBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOMD

NOMD Risk / Return Rank: 7
NOMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NOMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NOMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NOMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
NOMD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

TBB

TBB Risk / Return Rank: 28
TBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
TBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TBB Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
TBB Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOMD vs. TBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOMD	TBB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	-0.33	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.85	-0.43	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	0.95	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	-0.25	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	-0.55	-0.66

NOMD vs. TBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOMD Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the TBB Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOMD and TBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOMD vs. TBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOMD drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, which is greater than TBB's maximum drawdown of -16.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOMD and TBB.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOMD	TBB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.99%	-16.09%	-51.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.12%	-11.47%	-35.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.77%	-12.94%	-39.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.82%	-15.68%	-49.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.21%	-10.90%	-54.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.40%	-3.32%	-22.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.20%	5.23%	+26.97%

Volatility

NOMD vs. TBB - Volatility Comparison

Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) at 2.04%. This indicates that NOMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOMD	TBB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.72%	2.04%	+4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.55%	5.08%	+19.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.34%	8.62%	+22.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.27%	11.13%	+18.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.61%	10.94%	+17.67%

Dividends

NOMD vs. TBB - Dividend Comparison

NOMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than TBB's 6.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited	6.88%	5.44%	3.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBB AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66	6.51%	6.01%	5.48%	5.70%	6.17%	5.13%	3.63%	4.99%	6.07%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOMD and TBB in my portfolio?

NOMD and TBB have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOMD or TBB?

NOMD has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to TBB (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOMD dropped -67.99% vs TBB's -16.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.