FLO vs. COWZ
FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.) is a stock, while COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FLO returned -17.66%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for COWZ. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLO vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLO achieves a -32.62% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 11.74% return.
FLO
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -18.66%
- 6M
- -35.86%
- YTD
- -32.62%
- 1Y
- -51.82%
- 3Y*
- -30.35%
- 5Y*
- -17.66%
- 10Y*
- -4.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.13%
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $65.11M | $58.70M | $60.07M | |
| $40.48M | $40.44M | $62.79M |
FLO vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | -32.62% | -43.63% | -4.34% | -18.63% | 7.97% | 25.63% | 7.73% | 21.80% | -0.93% | 0.22% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 11.74% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLO and COWZ is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLO vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
FLO
COWZ
FLO vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLO | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.34 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 3.83 | -4.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 11.22 | -12.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLO vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLO drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLO | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -38.63% | -33.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.26% | -5.95% | -49.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.82% | -22.00% | -46.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.29% | -22.00% | -50.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.80% | -1.40% | -70.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.79% | -4.77% | -16.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.14% | 2.03% | +35.11% |
Volatility
FLO vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) has a higher volatility of 11.37% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 5.04%. This indicates that FLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLO | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.37% | 5.04% | +6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.84% | 8.74% | +22.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.61% | 11.91% | +25.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.85% | 17.69% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 19.86% | +5.72% |
Dividends
FLO vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.36%, more than COWZ's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.85% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | 12.36% | 9.03% | 4.60% | 4.04% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 3.45% | 3.84% | 3.47% | 3.13% | 2.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLO and COWZ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLO has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to COWZ (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLO dropped -72.29% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLO and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer