FLO vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLO or COWZ.
Performance
FLO vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLO achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 15.47% return.
FLO
1.25%
-1.87%
-5.65%
10.06%
4.15%
4.67%
COWZ
15.47%
1.82%
8.43%
21.97%
16.65%
N/A
Key characteristics
| FLO | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.53 | 1.58 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.84 | 2.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.34 | 2.82 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.31 | 6.67 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.53% | 3.20% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.53% | 13.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -52.54% | -38.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.41% | -1.78% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between FLO and COWZ is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLO vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLO vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than COWZ's 1.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | 4.25% | 4.04% | 3.10% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 3.45% | 3.84% | 3.47% | 3.13% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.07% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.84% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLO vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLO drawdown since its inception was -52.54%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLO vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 3.93%. This indicates that FLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.