FLO vs. COWZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).

COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016.

Performance

FLO vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLO vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc.	-23.22%	-43.63%	-4.34%	-18.63%	7.97%	25.63%	7.73%	21.80%	-0.93%	0.22%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	3.91%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	23.41%	-10.05%	20.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLO achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 3.91% return.

FLO

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -12.25%
• YTD: -23.22%
• 6M: -34.69%
• 1Y: -53.39%
• 3Y*: -29.50%
• 5Y*: -15.61%
• 10Y*: -3.89%

COWZ

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -3.51%
• YTD: 3.91%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 16.64%
• 3Y*: 12.12%
• 5Y*: 10.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FLO vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLO

FLO Risk / Return Rank: 2
FLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
FLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
FLO Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FLO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 51
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLO vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLO	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.74	0.96	-2.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.86	1.43	-4.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.67	1.21	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	1.20	-2.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.71	5.59	-7.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLO vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLO Sharpe Ratio is -1.74, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLO and COWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLO	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.74	0.96	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.67	0.62	-1.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.63	-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between FLO and COWZ is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FLO vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.18%, more than COWZ's 2.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc.	12.18%	9.03%	4.60%	4.04%	3.03%	3.02%	3.49%	3.45%	3.84%	3.47%	3.13%	2.64%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	2.07%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FLO vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLO drawdown since its inception was -67.87%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLO	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.87%	-38.63%	-29.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.05%	-13.55%	-40.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.87%	-22.00%	-45.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.87%	-3.72%	-64.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.38%	-4.85%	-15.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.41%	2.92%	+28.49%

Volatility

FLO vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.96%. This indicates that FLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLO	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	2.96%	+4.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.72%	8.37%	+16.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.69%	17.50%	+13.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.37%	17.73%	+5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.56%	20.08%	+4.48%