PortfoliosLab logo
FLO vs. ETD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FLO and ETD is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLO vs. ETD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLO:

-1.01

ETD:

0.02

Sortino Ratio

FLO:

-1.56

ETD:

0.19

Omega Ratio

FLO:

0.82

ETD:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

FLO:

-0.60

ETD:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

FLO:

-1.74

ETD:

-0.17

Ulcer Index

FLO:

13.87%

ETD:

9.32%

Daily Std Dev

FLO:

21.13%

ETD:

35.51%

Max Drawdown

FLO:

-83.49%

ETD:

-82.91%

Current Drawdown

FLO:

-38.12%

ETD:

-17.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLO:

$3.59B

ETD:

$667.03M

EPS

FLO:

$1.08

ETD:

$2.25

PE Ratio

FLO:

15.74

ETD:

11.66

PS Ratio

FLO:

0.71

ETD:

1.07

PB Ratio

FLO:

2.54

ETD:

1.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLO:

$5.08B

ETD:

$622.92M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLO:

$2.52B

ETD:

$378.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLO:

$510.05M

ETD:

$84.77M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLO achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than ETD's -3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FLO has underperformed ETD with an annualized return of 0.94%, while ETD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.35% annualized return.


FLO

YTD

-16.65%

1M

-3.41%

6M

-23.44%

1Y

-21.11%

3Y*

-11.24%

5Y*

-2.82%

10Y*

0.94%

ETD

YTD

-3.50%

1M

-7.02%

6M

-11.79%

1Y

0.88%

3Y*

10.95%

5Y*

26.85%

10Y*

6.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Flowers Foods, Inc.

Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLO vs. ETD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLO is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLO is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLO is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLO is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLO is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLO is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ETD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETD is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETD is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETD is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETD is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETD is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLO vs. ETD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLO Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the ETD Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLO and ETD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FLO vs. ETD - Dividend Comparison

FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than ETD's 7.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLO
Flowers Foods, Inc.
5.65%4.60%4.04%3.10%3.02%3.49%3.45%3.84%3.47%3.13%2.64%2.53%
ETD
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
7.43%6.87%5.95%6.62%10.61%3.12%9.34%6.08%2.66%1.76%1.87%1.36%

Drawdowns

FLO vs. ETD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLO drawdown since its inception was -83.49%, roughly equal to the maximum ETD drawdown of -82.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO and ETD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FLO vs. ETD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) is 7.72%, while Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) has a volatility of 16.55%. This indicates that FLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FLO vs. ETD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowers Foods, Inc. and Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
1.55B
142.70M
(FLO) Total Revenue
(ETD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLO vs. ETD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flowers Foods, Inc. and Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
49.9%
61.2%
(FLO) Gross Margin
(ETD) Gross Margin
FLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 775.88M and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.

ETD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.36M and revenue of 142.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

FLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of 85.13M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

ETD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported an operating income of 11.00M and revenue of 142.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

FLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a net income of 53.00M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

ETD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. reported a net income of 9.61M and revenue of 142.70M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.