FLO vs. ETD
Compare and contrast key facts about Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLO or ETD.
Correlation
The correlation between FLO and ETD is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLO vs. ETD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLO:
-0.37
ETD:
0.13
FLO:
-0.38
ETD:
0.40
FLO:
0.95
ETD:
1.05
FLO:
-0.22
ETD:
0.19
FLO:
-0.69
ETD:
0.37
FLO:
10.08%
ETD:
11.26%
FLO:
18.84%
ETD:
32.29%
FLO:
-83.49%
ETD:
-82.91%
FLO:
-27.76%
ETD:
-11.84%
Fundamentals
FLO:
$4.23B
ETD:
$734.42M
FLO:
$1.14
ETD:
$2.48
FLO:
17.63
ETD:
11.65
FLO:
$3.99B
ETD:
$469.39M
FLO:
$1.90B
ETD:
$285.95M
FLO:
$984.48M
ETD:
$68.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLO achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly lower than ETD's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FLO has underperformed ETD with an annualized return of 3.85%, while ETD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.23% annualized return.
FLO
-2.71%
-1.81%
-7.89%
-8.24%
2.03%
3.85%
ETD
2.74%
3.44%
-2.36%
1.47%
18.95%
6.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLO vs. ETD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLO
ETD
FLO vs. ETD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLO vs. ETD - Dividend Comparison
FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than ETD's 6.68% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | 4.73% | 4.60% | 4.04% | 3.10% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 3.45% | 3.84% | 3.47% | 3.13% | 2.64% | 2.53% |
ETD Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. | 6.68% | 6.87% | 5.95% | 6.62% | 10.61% | 3.12% | 9.34% | 6.08% | 2.66% | 1.76% | 1.87% | 1.36% |
Drawdowns
FLO vs. ETD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLO drawdown since its inception was -83.49%, roughly equal to the maximum ETD drawdown of -82.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO and ETD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLO vs. ETD - Volatility Comparison
Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) at 5.22%. This indicates that FLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FLO vs. ETD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowers Foods, Inc. and Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities