PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOMD vs. BMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOMD vs. BMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOMD achieves a -18.51% return, which is significantly lower than BMY's 3.67% return. Over the past 10 years, NOMD has outperformed BMY with an annualized return of 2.01%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively lower 0.91% annualized return.


NOMD

1D
-1.40%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
-18.51%
6M
-18.97%
1Y
-38.68%
3Y*
-14.32%
5Y*
-17.08%
10Y*
2.01%

BMY

1D
1.30%
1M
-8.01%
YTD
3.67%
6M
2.30%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
-1.14%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
0.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOMD vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
-18.51%-22.15%2.39%-1.68%-32.10%-0.12%13.63%33.79%-1.12%76.70%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
3.67%0.11%15.81%-26.14%18.98%2.88%0.41%27.74%-12.90%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NOMD and BMY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOMD:

$1.40B

BMY:

$111.78B

EPS

NOMD:

€0.91

BMY:

$3.57

PE Ratio

NOMD:

9.52

BMY:

15.34

PEG Ratio

NOMD:

15.36

BMY:

0.88

PS Ratio

NOMD:

0.42

BMY:

2.30

PB Ratio

NOMD:

0.49

BMY:

5.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOMD:

€3.00B

BMY:

$48.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOMD:

€798.02M

BMY:

$33.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOMD:

€343.69M

BMY:

$13.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOMD vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOMD
NOMD Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NOMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOMD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NOMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BMY
BMY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOMD vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOMDBMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.16

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.81

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

4.13

-5.33

NOMD vs. BMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOMD Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the BMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOMD and BMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOMD vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOMD drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, smaller than the maximum BMY drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOMD and BMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOMDBMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.99%

-72.03%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.12%

-12.53%

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.77%

-36.02%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.82%

-47.67%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.99%

-47.67%

-20.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.21%

-21.28%

-43.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.40%

-22.38%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.20%

5.48%

+26.72%

Volatility

NOMD vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is 6.72%, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that NOMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOMDBMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

8.54%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.55%

17.98%

+6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.34%

26.98%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.27%

24.08%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.61%

25.31%

+3.30%

Dividends

NOMD vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison

NOMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than BMY's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
4.57%4.60%4.24%4.44%3.00%2.36%3.69%2.55%3.08%2.55%1.95%2.17%
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
6.88%5.44%3.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NOMD vs. BMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nomad Foods Limited and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
726.96M
11.49B
(NOMD) Total Revenue
(BMY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NOMD values in EUR, BMY values in USD

NOMD vs. BMY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nomad Foods Limited and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
25.7%
70.2%
Portfolio components
NOMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a gross profit of 186.62M and revenue of 726.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.7%.

BMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a gross profit of 8.07B and revenue of 11.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.

NOMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported an operating income of 67.70M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.

BMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported an operating income of 3.27B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.

NOMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a net income of 29.38M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

BMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a net income of 2.68B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOMD and BMY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMY has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to NOMD (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOMD dropped -67.99% vs BMY's -72.03%.

BMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOMD and BMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer