PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOG vs. EME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOG vs. EME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOG achieves a -3.48% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 32.79% return. Over the past 10 years, NOG has underperformed EME with an annualized return of -5.15%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 33.42% annualized return.


NOG

1D
-4.36%
1M
-14.45%
YTD
-3.48%
6M
-9.31%
1Y
-29.75%
3Y*
-9.64%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
-5.15%

EME

1D
4.48%
1M
-12.26%
YTD
32.79%
6M
27.02%
1Y
72.30%
3Y*
67.28%
5Y*
45.46%
10Y*
33.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOG vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
-3.48%-38.20%4.84%25.54%54.51%136.72%-62.56%3.54%10.24%-25.45%
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
32.79%35.05%111.27%46.03%16.81%39.93%6.47%45.18%-26.68%16.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NOG and EME is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2007

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between NOG and EME has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOG:

$2.01B

EME:

$36.56B

EPS

NOG:

-$6.32

EME:

$29.65

PS Ratio

NOG:

1.32

EME:

2.06

PB Ratio

NOG:

1.13

EME:

9.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOG:

$1.52B

EME:

$17.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOG:

$450.66M

EME:

$3.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOG:

$73.21M

EME:

$2.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOG vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOG
NOG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

EME
EME Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOG vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOGEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.34

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

2.89

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

7.15

-8.58

NOG vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOG and EME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOG vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOG drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOG and EME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOGEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.96%

-70.56%

-28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.26%

-25.15%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.36%

-36.19%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.36%

-36.19%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.06%

-48.00%

-45.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.31%

-14.01%

-78.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.73%

-15.36%

-54.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.88%

10.14%

+10.74%

Volatility

NOG vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) has a higher volatility of 13.29% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 10.46%. This indicates that NOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOGEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.29%

10.46%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.99%

26.52%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.90%

38.61%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.16%

33.45%

+15.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.62%

33.04%

+37.58%

Dividends

NOG vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

NOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than EME's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.16%0.16%0.20%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
8.81%8.38%4.41%4.02%2.86%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NOG vs. EME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
5.03M
4.63B
(NOG) Total Revenue
(EME) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NOG and EME have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOG has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to EME (10.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOG dropped -98.96% vs EME's -70.56%.

EME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOG and EME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer