NOCBX vs. BBALX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NOCBX (Northern Core Bond Fund) and BBALX (Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - NOCBX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Northern Funds, while BBALX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Northern Funds. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX returned 1.18%/yr vs 7.04%/yr for BBALX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NOCBX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BBALX.

Performance

NOCBX vs. BBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOCBX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than BBALX's 7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX has underperformed BBALX with an annualized return of 1.18%, while BBALX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.04% annualized return.

NOCBX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 6M: -0.02%
• 1Y: 4.32%
• 3Y*: 3.36%
• 5Y*: -0.78%
• 10Y*: 1.18%

BBALX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 17.99%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: 7.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOCBX vs. BBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund	-0.13%	6.17%	1.10%	5.07%	-14.51%	-1.62%	7.32%	9.76%	-1.03%	4.05%
BBALX Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund	7.50%	14.74%	8.00%	10.74%	-12.79%	11.17%	6.45%	17.62%	-7.89%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NOCBX and BBALX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2001	-0.02

The correlation between NOCBX and BBALX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NOCBX vs. BBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOCBX

NOCBX Risk / Return Rank: 18
NOCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
NOCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
NOCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NOCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NOCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BBALX

BBALX Risk / Return Rank: 61
BBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOCBX vs. BBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOCBX	BBALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	2.08	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.93	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.39	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	2.88	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.88	12.21	-8.32

NOCBX vs. BBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOCBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the BBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCBX and BBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOCBX vs. BBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum BBALX drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and BBALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOCBX	BBALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.02%	-33.24%	+13.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.17%	-6.42%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.61%	-9.72%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.95%	-18.75%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.02%	-26.33%	+6.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.27%	-0.65%	-4.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-5.48%	+2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	1.50%	-0.38%

Volatility

NOCBX vs. BBALX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) is 1.37%, while Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that NOCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOCBX	BBALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	3.30%	-1.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.98%	7.34%	-4.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91%	8.86%	-4.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.12%	9.98%	-3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.07%	10.71%	-5.64%

NOCBX vs. BBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BBALX's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOCBX vs. BBALX - Dividend Comparison

NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than BBALX's 2.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBALX Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund	2.71%	3.11%	3.28%	3.72%	7.22%	4.57%	6.63%	2.15%	4.23%	3.26%	3.01%	4.20%
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund	4.05%	3.14%	3.82%	2.99%	1.66%	1.56%	3.58%	2.75%	3.16%	2.88%	2.05%	3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOCBX and BBALX in my portfolio?

NOCBX and BBALX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOCBX or BBALX?

BBALX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to NOCBX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOCBX dropped -20.02% vs BBALX's -33.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.