PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOC vs. ITA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOC vs. ITA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than ITA's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has underperformed ITA with an annualized return of 11.53%, while ITA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.


NOC

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.75%
YTD
-2.75%
6M
-2.67%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
11.53%

ITA

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.16%
YTD
8.97%
6M
11.71%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
27.30%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOC vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
-2.75%23.61%1.93%-12.79%43.02%29.29%-9.92%42.69%-18.95%33.88%
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.97%48.64%15.81%14.33%9.96%9.39%-13.57%30.51%-7.22%35.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NOC and ITA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006

0.67

The correlation between NOC and ITA shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOC vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOC
NOC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

ITA
ITA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOC vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOCITADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

1.97

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

5.20

-4.18

NOC vs. ITA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the ITA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOC and ITA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOC vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than ITA's maximum drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and ITA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCITADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-59.72%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.20%

-15.82%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.20%

-15.82%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.20%

-18.72%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.38%

-51.00%

+14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.03%

-6.64%

-21.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-9.45%

-8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.25%

5.97%

+6.28%

Volatility

NOC vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 7.39%, while iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOCITADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

9.07%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.25%

18.47%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

21.74%

+4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.28%

20.21%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

23.22%

+2.20%

Dividends

NOC vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison

NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than ITA's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.46%0.55%0.85%0.93%0.95%0.82%1.07%1.54%1.13%0.91%1.07%1.04%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.71%1.58%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOC and ITA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to NOC (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs ITA's -59.72%.

ITA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOC and ITA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer