PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOC vs. CVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOC vs. CVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than CVX's 25.18% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has outperformed CVX with an annualized return of 11.53%, while CVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.94% annualized return.


NOC

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.75%
YTD
-2.75%
6M
-2.67%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
11.53%

CVX

1D
0.75%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
25.18%
6M
27.20%
1Y
33.69%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOC vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
-2.75%23.61%1.93%-12.79%43.02%29.29%-9.92%42.69%-18.95%33.88%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
25.18%10.10%1.29%-13.63%58.46%46.24%-25.95%15.27%-9.75%10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NOC and CVX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2001

0.33

The correlation between NOC and CVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOC:

$78.42B

CVX:

$371.80B

EPS

NOC:

$31.95

CVX:

$5.75

PE Ratio

NOC:

17.22

CVX:

32.54

PEG Ratio

NOC:

2.54

CVX:

3.17

PS Ratio

NOC:

1.86

CVX:

1.93

PB Ratio

NOC:

4.58

CVX:

2.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOC:

$42.37B

CVX:

$185.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOC:

$8.69B

CVX:

$47.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOC:

$7.50B

CVX:

$40.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOC vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOC
NOC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CVX
CVX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOC vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOCCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.27

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

2.48

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

6.10

-5.08

NOC vs. CVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the CVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOC and CVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOC vs. CVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than CVX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and CVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-55.77%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.20%

-13.99%

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.20%

-20.64%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.20%

-24.95%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.38%

-55.77%

+19.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.03%

-10.52%

-17.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-11.39%

-7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.25%

5.68%

+6.57%

Volatility

NOC vs. CVX - Volatility Comparison

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Chevron Corporation (CVX) have volatilities of 7.39% and 7.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOCCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

7.62%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.25%

17.86%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

22.06%

+4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.28%

25.15%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

29.16%

-3.74%

Dividends

NOC vs. CVX - Dividend Comparison

NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than CVX's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.73%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.71%1.58%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%

Financials

NOC vs. CVX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Chevron Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
9.88B
47.56B
(NOC) Total Revenue
(CVX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOC vs. CVX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Chevron Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
19.8%
9.6%
Portfolio components
NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.96B and revenue of 9.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

CVX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 989.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

CVX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 875.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

CVX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOC and CVX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to NOC (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs CVX's -55.77%.

CVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOC and CVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer