PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOC vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOC vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 80.95% return.


NOC

1D
-1.99%
1M
-9.06%
YTD
-11.11%
6M
-12.97%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
10.75%

CHPY

1D
-0.95%
1M
9.84%
YTD
80.95%
6M
79.34%
1Y
127.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOC vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NOC and CHPY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOC vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOC
NOC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOC vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOCCHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.61

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

10.53

-10.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.42

36.72

-36.30

NOC vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOC and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOC vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-12.19%

-58.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.22%

-12.17%

-22.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.22%

-7.85%

-26.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-2.15%

-16.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.27%

3.48%

+9.79%

Volatility

NOC vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 9.39%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 19.71%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOCCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

19.71%

-10.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.02%

27.92%

-5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.65%

32.59%

-5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

36.33%

-10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.51%

36.33%

-10.82%

Dividends

NOC vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than CHPY's 29.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
29.92%28.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.87%1.58%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOC and CHPY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (19.71%) compared to NOC (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs CHPY's -12.19%.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOC and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer