NOC vs. CHPY
NOC (Northrop Grumman Corporation) is a stock, while CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, NOC returned 5.56% vs 127.37% for CHPY. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
NOC vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 80.95% return.
NOC
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- -11.11%
- 6M
- -12.97%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
CHPY
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 80.95%
- 6M
- 79.34%
- 1Y
- 127.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOC vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | -11.11% | 12.76% |
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 80.95% | 56.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOC and CHPY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOC vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank
NOC
CHPY
NOC vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOC | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.61 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 10.53 | -10.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 36.72 | -36.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOC vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and CHPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOC | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -12.19% | -58.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.22% | -12.17% | -22.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.22% | -7.85% | -26.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -2.15% | -16.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.27% | 3.48% | +9.79% |
Volatility
NOC vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 9.39%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 19.71%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOC | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 19.71% | -10.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 27.92% | -5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 32.59% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 36.33% | -10.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.51% | 36.33% | -10.82% |
Dividends
NOC vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison
NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than CHPY's 29.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 29.92% | 28.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.87% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOC and CHPY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPY has higher volatility (19.71%) compared to NOC (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs CHPY's -12.19%.
CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOC and CHPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer