CHPY vs. NVYY

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while NVYY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 95.00% vs 5.62% for NVYY. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CHPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for NVYY.

Performance

CHPY vs. NVYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 56.70% return, which is significantly higher than NVYY's 2.07% return.

CHPY

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -10.41%
• 6M: 38.53%
• YTD: 56.70%
• 1Y: 95.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 96.22%

NVYY

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: -0.36%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 1Y: 5.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	$51.63M	$53.85M	$60.48M
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF	$402.28K	$501.71K	$1.05M

CHPY vs. NVYY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	56.70%	37.87%
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF	2.07%	31.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and NVYY is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025	0.51

The correlation between CHPY and NVYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CHPY vs. NVYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

NVYY

NVYY Risk / Return Rank: 16
NVYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
NVYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
NVYY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
NVYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NVYY Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHPY vs. NVYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPY	NVYY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	0.24	+2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	0.47	+2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.06	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	0.38	+3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.85	0.79	+15.05

CHPY vs. NVYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the NVYY Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and NVYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. NVYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, which is greater than NVYY's maximum drawdown of -14.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and NVYY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPY	NVYY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.64%	-14.90%	-12.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.64%	-14.90%	-12.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.20%	-7.16%	-13.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.08%	-5.25%	+2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	7.09%	-1.08%

Volatility

CHPY vs. NVYY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 17.01% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) at 3.85%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPY	NVYY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.01%	3.85%	+13.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.89%	14.68%	+19.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.24%	23.69%	+14.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.09%	22.97%	+16.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.09%	22.97%	+16.12%

CHPY vs. NVYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NVYY's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPY vs. NVYY - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.40%, less than NVYY's 132.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	38.40%	28.19%
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF	132.70%	75.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPY and NVYY in my portfolio?

CHPY and NVYY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPY or NVYY?

CHPY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to NVYY (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -27.64% vs NVYY's -14.90%.

Which ETF is better, CHPY or NVYY?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 95.00% vs 5.62% for NVYY. On fees, CHPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPY or NVYY?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 95.00% return vs 5.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPY or NVYY?

CHPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPY or NVYY?

NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 132.70%, compared with 38.40% for CHPY.

What is the main difference between CHPY and NVYY?

CHPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVYY is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 1.15% for NVYY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.