NOBL vs. BUFP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP).

NOBL and BUFP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. BUFP is a passively managed fund by PGIM that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024. Both NOBL and BUFP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NOBL vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NOBL vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.32%	6.84%	4.32%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	-0.84%	12.92%	6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's -0.84% return.

NOBL

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -6.79%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 4.06%
• 1Y: 6.18%
• 3Y*: 7.40%
• 5Y*: 6.30%
• 10Y*: 9.54%

BUFP

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: -0.84%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.

BUFP

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Return for Risk

NOBL vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 23
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 25

BUFP

BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 73
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOBL	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.25	-0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	1.89	-1.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.32	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	1.73	-1.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.89	9.93	-8.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOBL vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOBL	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	1.25	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.05	-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and BUFP is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NOBL vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.14%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and BUFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOBL	BUFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-11.98%	-23.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-8.16%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.07%	-2.05%	-5.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-1.08%	-2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	1.42%	+1.76%

Volatility

NOBL vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOBL	BUFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	3.45%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.06%	5.01%	+3.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	11.12%	+4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.39%	9.78%	+4.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	9.78%	+6.81%