NMTFX vs. EKWAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NMTFX (Allspring Minnesota Tax-Free Fund) and EKWAX (Allspring Precious Metals Fund) are both mutual funds - NMTFX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Allspring Global Investments, while EKWAX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, NMTFX returned 1.97%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for EKWAX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NMTFX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for EKWAX.

Performance

NMTFX vs. EKWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Minnesota Tax-Free Fund (NMTFX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMTFX achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than EKWAX's -1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, NMTFX has underperformed EKWAX with an annualized return of 1.97%, while EKWAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.

NMTFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 1.53%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 4.17%
• 5Y*: 1.35%
• 10Y*: 1.97%

EKWAX

• 1D: -3.37%
• 1M: -1.21%
• YTD: -1.01%
• 6M: 6.25%
• 1Y: 61.84%
• 3Y*: 45.31%
• 5Y*: 22.47%
• 10Y*: 14.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMTFX vs. EKWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMTFX Allspring Minnesota Tax-Free Fund	1.53%	6.39%	2.03%	3.72%	-6.66%	0.74%	3.84%	6.06%	0.71%	3.74%
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	-1.01%	163.65%	21.28%	8.83%	-7.75%	-11.00%	24.40%	40.35%	-12.83%	9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between NMTFX and EKWAX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 1998	0.07

The correlation between NMTFX and EKWAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NMTFX vs. EKWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMTFX

NMTFX Risk / Return Rank: 85
NMTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
NMTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NMTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
NMTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
NMTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

EKWAX

EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 24
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMTFX vs. EKWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Minnesota Tax-Free Fund (NMTFX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NMTFX	EKWAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	1.43	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.09	1.83	+3.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.89	1.26	+0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	2.15	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.36	5.52	+6.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NMTFX vs. EKWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMTFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the EKWAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMTFX and EKWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMTFX	EKWAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11	1.43	+1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.67	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.44	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.32	+0.82

Drawdowns

NMTFX vs. EKWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMTFX drawdown since its inception was -10.68%, smaller than the maximum EKWAX drawdown of -76.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMTFX and EKWAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMTFX	EKWAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.68%	-76.76%	+66.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.25%	-29.03%	+26.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.59%	-29.03%	+24.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.43%	-42.79%	+32.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.43%	-49.23%	+38.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-26.39%	+26.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-32.77%	+31.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	11.29%	-10.69%

Volatility

NMTFX vs. EKWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Minnesota Tax-Free Fund (NMTFX) is 0.97%, while Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a volatility of 15.29%. This indicates that NMTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMTFX	EKWAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.97%	15.29%	-14.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.74%	35.84%	-34.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38%	43.51%	-41.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.20%	33.49%	-30.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.23%	33.08%	-29.85%

NMTFX vs. EKWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMTFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EKWAX's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMTFX vs. EKWAX - Dividend Comparison

NMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than EKWAX's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	1.21%	1.19%	0.84%	0.00%	2.01%	1.35%	1.45%	0.11%	0.00%	1.34%	1.11%	0.00%
NMTFX Allspring Minnesota Tax-Free Fund	3.42%	5.40%	3.50%	2.13%	1.72%	1.65%	1.91%	2.48%	2.69%	2.63%	3.30%	3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMTFX and EKWAX in my portfolio?

NMTFX and EKWAX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMTFX or EKWAX?

EKWAX has higher volatility (15.29%) compared to NMTFX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMTFX dropped -10.68% vs EKWAX's -76.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.