NMAI vs. WMRIX
NMAI (Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund) and WMRIX (Wilmington Real Asset Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 3 years, NMAI returned 20.22%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for WMRIX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NMAI charges 2.91%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for WMRIX.
Performance
NMAI vs. WMRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMAI achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than WMRIX's 15.58% return.
NMAI
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMRIX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 15.58%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
NMAI vs. WMRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMAI Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund | 11.74% | 20.03% | 11.65% | 19.52% | -26.38% | -1.71% |
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund | 15.58% | 12.79% | 2.57% | 1.12% | -8.03% | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMAI and WMRIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2021 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NMAI and WMRIX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMAI vs. WMRIX — Risk / Return Rank
NMAI
WMRIX
NMAI vs. WMRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMAI | WMRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.49 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 6.27 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 19.33 | -10.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMAI | WMRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.69 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.56 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
NMAI vs. WMRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMAI drawdown since its inception was -35.61%, smaller than the maximum WMRIX drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAI and WMRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMAI | WMRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.61% | -37.84% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.88% | -3.74% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.05% | -10.95% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -3.23% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -7.17% | -5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 1.21% | +1.54% |
Volatility
NMAI vs. WMRIX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) at 2.58%. This indicates that NMAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMAI | WMRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 2.58% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.70% | 6.76% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 8.81% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 11.51% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 12.51% | +4.07% |
NMAI vs. WMRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMAI has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than WMRIX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
NMAI vs. WMRIX - Dividend Comparison
NMAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than WMRIX's 6.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMAI Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund | 10.40% | 9.89% | 13.73% | 10.57% | 19.45% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund | 6.19% | 7.15% | 1.02% | 3.51% | 6.07% | 9.29% | 1.99% | 3.03% | 2.84% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 5.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NMAI and WMRIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMAI has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to WMRIX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMAI dropped -35.61% vs WMRIX's -37.84%.
WMRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NMAI and WMRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer