PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMRIX vs. WTAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMRIX vs. WTAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMRIX achieves a 17.01% return, which is significantly higher than WTAIX's -0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, WMRIX has outperformed WTAIX with an annualized return of 5.53%, while WTAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.32% annualized return.


WMRIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.19%
6M
9.61%
YTD
17.01%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
10.64%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
5.53%
ALL TIME*
6.48%

WTAIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.60%
6M
-1.37%
YTD
-0.43%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
1.32%
ALL TIME*
3.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WMRIX vs. WTAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
17.01%12.79%2.57%1.12%-8.03%21.49%-2.19%16.85%-7.21%11.81%
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
-0.43%5.05%0.73%5.14%-8.01%0.55%2.60%7.12%0.86%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between WMRIX and WTAIX is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2003

0.07

The correlation between WMRIX and WTAIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMRIX vs. WTAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WMRIX
WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

WTAIX
WTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
WTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WMRIX vs. WTAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMRIXWTAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

1.36

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

3.62

+7.50

WMRIX vs. WTAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the WTAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMRIX and WTAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMRIX vs. WTAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, which is greater than WTAIX's maximum drawdown of -12.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMRIX and WTAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMRIXWTAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.84%

-12.35%

-25.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-2.76%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

-4.06%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-12.35%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.27%

-12.35%

-18.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-2.35%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-1.63%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.04%

+1.06%

Volatility

WMRIX vs. WTAIX - Volatility Comparison

Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that WMRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMRIXWTAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

0.79%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

1.84%

+4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.89%

2.22%

+6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.44%

3.10%

+8.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.51%

3.43%

+9.08%

WMRIX vs. WTAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMRIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than WTAIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMRIX vs. WTAIX - Dividend Comparison

WMRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than WTAIX's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
6.09%7.15%1.02%3.51%6.07%9.29%1.99%3.03%2.84%2.73%0.00%5.31%
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
2.50%2.85%2.11%2.03%1.45%1.68%1.72%3.84%2.15%2.92%2.63%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMRIX and WTAIX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMRIX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to WTAIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMRIX dropped -37.84% vs WTAIX's -12.35%.

WMRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMRIX and WTAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer