NMAI vs. ECAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NMAI (Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - NMAI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Nuveen, while ECAT is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, NMAI returned 19.11%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for ECAT. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NMAI charges 2.91%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for ECAT.

Performance

NMAI vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NMAI having a 10.82% return and ECAT slightly higher at 11.26%.

NMAI

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 6M: 11.68%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: 19.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ECAT

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 6M: 9.76%
• 1Y: 21.00%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMAI vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NMAI Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund	10.82%	20.03%	11.65%	19.52%	-26.38%	-4.91%
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust	11.26%	16.64%	19.96%	32.36%	-21.90%	-3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NMAI and ECAT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021	0.66

The correlation between NMAI and ECAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NMAI vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMAI

NMAI Risk / Return Rank: 43
NMAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
NMAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
NMAI Omega Ratio Rank: 48
NMAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
NMAI Martin Ratio Rank: 43

ECAT

ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 30
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 31
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMAI vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMAI	ECAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.53	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.19	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	1.79	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	6.64	+2.03

NMAI vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMAI and ECAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NMAI vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMAI drawdown since its inception was -37.40%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAI and ECAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMAI	ECAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.40%	-32.23%	-5.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.88%	-11.80%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.05%	-15.79%	+2.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-1.17%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.93%	-9.03%	-4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	3.17%	-0.35%

Volatility

NMAI vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMAI	ECAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	4.44%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.16%	11.00%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.09%	13.79%	-0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.65%	16.89%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.65%	16.89%	-0.24%

NMAI vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMAI has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than ECAT's 1.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMAI vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

NMAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, less than ECAT's 21.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust	21.94%	23.00%	17.44%	9.14%	8.94%	0.54%
NMAI Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund	10.50%	9.89%	13.73%	10.57%	19.45%	1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMAI and ECAT in my portfolio?

NMAI and ECAT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMAI or ECAT?

NMAI has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to ECAT (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMAI dropped -37.40% vs ECAT's -32.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.