PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLR vs. GEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLR vs. GEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than GEV's 44.12% return.


NLR

1D
0.84%
1M
-10.59%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
-3.70%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
19.78%
10Y*
12.80%

GEV

1D
3.74%
1M
-11.47%
YTD
44.12%
6M
40.23%
1Y
93.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. GEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
-1.81%56.50%9.50%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
44.12%99.02%186.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and GEV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.52

The correlation between NLR and GEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLR vs. GEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GEV
GEV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. GEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLRGEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.33

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

3.82

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

11.27

-9.86

NLR vs. GEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the GEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and GEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLR vs. GEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than GEV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and GEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLRGEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.05%

-38.29%

-26.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.72%

-24.57%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.81%

-18.17%

-7.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-6.99%

-28.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.33%

8.31%

+5.02%

Volatility

NLR vs. GEV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) have volatilities of 13.73% and 13.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLRGEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.73%

13.17%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.75%

34.45%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.85%

49.09%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.56%

53.62%

-24.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.22%

53.62%

-29.40%

Dividends

NLR vs. GEV - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than GEV's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
0.16%0.11%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
2.60%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLR and GEV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to GEV (13.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs GEV's -38.29%.

GEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLR and GEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer