NLR vs. EGLN.L
NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 12.80%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for EGLN.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EGLN.L.
Performance
NLR vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NLR is traded in USD, while EGLN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than EGLN.L's -2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has outperformed EGLN.L with an annualized return of 12.80%, while EGLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.
NLR
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -10.59%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -3.70%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 19.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -10.28%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
NLR vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -1.81% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -2.27% | 65.63% | 26.01% | 12.82% | -0.37% | -3.23% | 23.75% | 18.25% | -1.44% | 13.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and EGLN.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.20 |
The correlation between NLR and EGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (10 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLR vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
NLR
EGLN.L
NLR vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLR | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.06 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.41 | 3.23 | -1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLR vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLR | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.05% | -59.11% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.72% | -22.68% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.48% | -22.68% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | -22.68% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.35% | -26.49% | -7.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.81% | -20.57% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.70% | -33.85% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.33% | 7.44% | +5.89% |
Volatility
NLR vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 7.25%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLR | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.73% | 7.25% | +6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.75% | 21.66% | +12.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.85% | 24.87% | +17.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.56% | 18.43% | +11.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 17.10% | +7.12% |
NLR vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLR vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, while EGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.60% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLR and EGLN.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while EGLN.L is Gold. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.25% for EGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for NLR and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer