PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NITE vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NITE vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NITE achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 57.26% return.


NITE

1D
-1.06%
1M
-4.33%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-6.25%
1M
-10.39%
YTD
57.26%
6M
44.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NITE vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NITE
The Nightview Fund
-0.70%2.82%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
57.26%-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NITE and MEME is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.52

NITE vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NITE
MEME

Consumer Cyclical

33.9%

-

Technology

29.8%
66.7%

Financial Services

16.3%
5.5%

Communication Services

11.9%
5.5%

Industrials

4.1%
22.3%

Utilities

4.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

3.8%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

4.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

NITE
33.9%
MEME

-

Technology

NITE
29.8%
MEME
66.7%

Financial Services

NITE
16.3%
MEME
5.5%

Communication Services

NITE
11.9%
MEME
5.5%

Industrials

NITE
4.1%
MEME
22.3%

Utilities

NITE
4.0%
MEME
4.9%

Healthcare

NITE
3.8%
MEME
5.4%

Basic Materials

NITE

-

MEME
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

NITE

-

MEME

-

Energy

NITE

-

MEME
4.8%

Real Estate

NITE

-

MEME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NITE vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NITE
NITE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NITE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NITE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NITE vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NITEMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

NITE vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NITE vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NITE drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NITE and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NITEMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-48.78%

+19.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.38%

-17.37%

+6.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-28.63%

+23.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

Volatility

NITE vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NITEMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.57%

75.52%

-54.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.72%

75.52%

-48.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.72%

75.52%

-48.80%

NITE vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

NITE has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

NITE vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither NITE nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NITE and MEME have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for NITE.

NITE and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Nightview and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for NITE and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NITE and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer