NITE vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NITE (The Nightview Fund) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NITE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nightview, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. NITE is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past year, NITE returned 20.23% vs 25.06% for ENFR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NITE charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

NITE vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NITE achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.18% return.

NITE

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -4.33%
• YTD: -0.70%
• 6M: -2.70%
• 1Y: 20.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: 23.18%
• 6M: 23.40%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 28.30%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NITE vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NITE The Nightview Fund	-0.70%	22.57%	19.07%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.18%	5.88%	23.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NITE and ENFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	0.16

The correlation between NITE and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NITE vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NITE	ENFR
Consumer Cyclical	33.9%	-
Technology	29.8%	-
Financial Services	16.3%	0.1%
Communication Services	11.9%	-
Industrials	4.1%	3.4%
Utilities	4.0%	1.4%
Healthcare	3.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	98.5%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NITE vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NITE

NITE Risk / Return Rank: 29
NITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
NITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NITE Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NITE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 55
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NITE vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NITE	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.69	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.35	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.29	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	2.91	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	7.39	-3.27

NITE vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NITE Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NITE and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NITE vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NITE drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NITE and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NITE	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-68.28%	+38.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.16%	-8.64%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.38%	-6.04%	-4.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-15.93%	+10.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.92%	3.40%	+1.52%

Volatility

NITE vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The Nightview Fund (NITE) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.68%. This indicates that NITE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NITE	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.50%	5.68%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.85%	11.71%	+4.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.57%	14.91%	+5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.72%	19.26%	+7.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.72%	24.68%	+2.04%

NITE vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NITE has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NITE vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

NITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.07%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
NITE The Nightview Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NITE and ENFR in my portfolio?

NITE and ENFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NITE or ENFR?

NITE has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to ENFR (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NITE dropped -29.57% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, NITE or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 25.06% vs 20.23% for NITE. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NITE or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 25.06% return vs 20.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NITE or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for NITE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NITE or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.00% for NITE.

What is the main difference between NITE and ENFR?

NITE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nightview and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for NITE and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.