NICE vs. SSRM
NICE (NICE Ltd.) and SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) are both stocks. NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology), while SSRM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, NICE returned 3.87%/yr vs 6.63%/yr for SSRM. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NICE vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NICE achieves a -12.61% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 16.88% return. Over the past 10 years, NICE has underperformed SSRM with an annualized return of 3.87%, while SSRM has yielded a comparatively higher 6.63% annualized return.
NICE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -36.69%
- 3Y*
- -22.99%
- 5Y*
- -18.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.38%
SSRM
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 114.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | $70.31M | $53.40M | $68.66M |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | $78.06M | $81.55M | $92.56M |
NICE vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | -12.61% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -36.66% | 7.07% | 82.75% | 43.38% | 17.73% | 33.92% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 16.88% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between NICE and SSRM is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1996 | 0.10 |
The correlation between NICE and SSRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NICE:
$5.79B
SSRM:
$5.32B
NICE:
$8.52
SSRM:
$3.26
NICE:
11.59
SSRM:
7.85
NICE:
0.35
SSRM:
0.12
NICE:
2.04
SSRM:
2.93
NICE:
1.63
SSRM:
1.26
NICE:
$3.01B
SSRM:
$1.90B
NICE:
$1.98B
SSRM:
$643.76M
NICE:
$841.27M
SSRM:
$835.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NICE vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank
NICE
SSRM
NICE vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NICE | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.28 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 3.68 | -4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 8.07 | -9.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NICE vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and SSRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NICE | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.23% | -91.68% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.64% | -31.28% | -15.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.21% | -73.41% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.60% | -83.16% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.60% | -83.16% | +9.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.64% | -41.14% | -27.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -57.06% | +21.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.66% | 14.23% | +14.43% |
Volatility
NICE vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NICE Ltd. (NICE) is 16.53%, while SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a volatility of 17.57%. This indicates that NICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NICE | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.53% | 17.57% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.99% | 55.14% | -10.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.76% | 68.57% | -15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.40% | 56.61% | -16.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 53.15% | -19.58% |
Dividends
NICE vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison
Neither NICE nor SSRM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NICE vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NICE Ltd. and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NICE vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison
NICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
SSRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
SSRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.
NICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
SSRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NICE and SSRM have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSRM has higher volatility (17.57%) compared to NICE (16.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NICE dropped -93.23% vs SSRM's -91.68%.
SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NICE and SSRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer