NICE vs. FL

In the year-to-date period, NICE achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly higher than FL's -40.53% return. Over the past 10 years, NICE has outperformed FL with an annualized return of 10.21%, while FL has yielded a comparatively lower -12.05% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Foot Locker, Inc. (FL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NICE Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is comparable to the FL Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NICE and FL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither NICE nor FL has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, which is greater than FL's maximum drawdown of -88.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and FL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for NICE Ltd. (NICE) is 14.98%, while Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) has a volatility of 32.33%. This indicates that NICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NICE Ltd. and Foot Locker, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.