NICE vs. FL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NICE (NICE Ltd.) and FL (Foot Locker, Inc.) are both stocks. NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology), while FL operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical).

Performance

NICE vs. FL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Foot Locker, Inc. (FL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NICE

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: -23.58%
• YTD: -16.04%
• 6M: -10.65%
• 1Y: -44.32%
• 3Y*: -22.84%
• 5Y*: -15.17%
• 10Y*: 3.94%

FL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NICE vs. FL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NICE NICE Ltd.	-15.15%
FL Foot Locker, Inc.	0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NICE : $5.75B FL : $2.30B
EPS NICE : $8.49 FL : -$4.03
PS Ratio NICE : 1.97 FL : 0.29
PB Ratio NICE : 1.56 FL : 0.89
Total Revenue (TTM) NICE : $3.01B FL : $7.86B
Gross Profit (TTM) NICE : $1.98B FL : $2.22B
EBITDA (TTM) NICE : $841.27M FL : -$37.00M

Return for Risk

NICE vs. FL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NICE

NICE Risk / Return Rank: 8
NICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
NICE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
NICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
NICE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NICE vs. FL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Foot Locker, Inc. (FL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NICE	FL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.12	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NICE	FL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	—	—

Drawdowns

NICE vs. FL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, which is greater than FL's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and FL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NICE	FL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.23%	0.00%	-93.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.87%	0.00%	-69.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.15%	0.00%	-35.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NICE	FL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.97%	0.00%	+50.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.81%	0.00%	+39.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.21%	0.00%	+33.21%

Dividends

NICE vs. FL - Dividend Comparison

Neither NICE nor FL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FL Foot Locker, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NICE NICE Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.14%	0.76%	0.91%

Financials

NICE vs. FL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NICE Ltd. and Foot Locker, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.

FL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foot Locker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 457.00M and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.6%.

NICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

FL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foot Locker, Inc. reported an operating income of -11.00M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.

NICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

FL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foot Locker, Inc. reported a net income of -38.00M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.