NICE vs. GFI
NICE (NICE Ltd.) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, NICE returned 3.87%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for GFI. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NICE vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NICE achieves a -12.61% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -23.58% return. Over the past 10 years, NICE has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 3.87%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 20.74% annualized return.
NICE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -36.69%
- 3Y*
- -22.99%
- 5Y*
- -18.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.38%
GFI
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -33.43%
- YTD
- -23.58%
- 1Y
- 38.42%
- 3Y*
- 37.99%
- 5Y*
- 31.37%
- 10Y*
- 20.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $102.92M | $118.13M | $131.61M | |
NICE NICE Ltd. | $70.31M | $53.40M | $68.66M |
NICE vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | -12.61% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -36.66% | 7.07% | 82.75% | 43.38% | 17.73% | 33.92% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -23.58% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NICE and GFI is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.08 |
The correlation between NICE and GFI shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NICE:
$5.79B
GFI:
$29.02B
NICE:
$8.52
GFI:
$5.39
NICE:
11.59
GFI:
6.01
NICE:
0.35
GFI:
0.10
NICE:
2.04
GFI:
2.07
NICE:
1.63
GFI:
3.44
NICE:
$3.01B
GFI:
$13.98B
NICE:
$1.98B
GFI:
$7.34B
NICE:
$841.27M
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NICE vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
NICE
GFI
NICE vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NICE | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.15 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 0.81 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 1.70 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NICE vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NICE | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.23% | -88.05% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.64% | -47.72% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.21% | -47.72% | -20.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.60% | -56.22% | -17.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.60% | -63.09% | -10.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.64% | -45.76% | -22.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -44.24% | +8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.66% | 22.70% | +5.96% |
Volatility
NICE vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
NICE Ltd. (NICE) has a higher volatility of 16.53% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 12.44%. This indicates that NICE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NICE | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.53% | 12.44% | +4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.99% | 46.19% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.76% | 61.58% | -8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.40% | 52.84% | -12.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 54.58% | -21.01% |
Dividends
NICE vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
NICE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.68% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
Financials
NICE vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NICE Ltd. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NICE vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
NICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
NICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
NICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NICE and GFI have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NICE has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to GFI (12.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NICE dropped -93.23% vs GFI's -88.05%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NICE and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer