PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGHT vs. FITZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NGHT vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NGHT

1D
-1.38%
1M
1.96%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FITZ

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.78%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGHT vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NGHT and FITZ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NGHT vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NGHT vs. FITZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NGHT vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGHT drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -7.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGHT and FITZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NGHTFITZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.53%

-7.37%

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.99%

-3.11%

-16.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-4.03%

-5.19%

Volatility

NGHT vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NGHTFITZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.93%

17.03%

+12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.93%

17.03%

+12.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.93%

17.03%

+12.90%

NGHT vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NGHT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NGHT vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither NGHT nor FITZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NGHT and FITZ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for NGHT.

NGHT and FITZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NGHT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FITZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for NGHT and 0.75% for FITZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NGHT and FITZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer