NFTY vs. CIBR
NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFTY is a India Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NFTY returned 7.54%/yr vs 18.55%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
NFTY vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFTY achieves a -8.16% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 30.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NFTY has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 7.54%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.
NFTY
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- -8.16%
- 1Y
- -8.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
CIBR
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 28.88%
- YTD
- 30.63%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 27.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
NFTY vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -8.16% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 10.04% | 0.58% | -1.51% | 21.78% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 30.63% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFTY and CIBR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015 | 0.28 |
The correlation between NFTY and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NFTY vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NFTY
CIBR
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Energy
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
NFTY
CIBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
NFTY
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
NFTY
CIBR
-
Healthcare
NFTY
CIBR
-
Technology
NFTY
CIBR
Energy
NFTY
CIBR
-
Industrials
NFTY
CIBR
Consumer Defensive
NFTY
CIBR
-
Utilities
NFTY
CIBR
-
Communication Services
NFTY
CIBR
Real Estate
NFTY
-
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFTY vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
NFTY
CIBR
NFTY vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFTY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.20 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 1.28 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 2.96 | -4.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFTY vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFTY drawdown since its inception was -47.67%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFTY and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFTY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.67% | -33.89% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.14% | -21.99% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.55% | -21.99% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -33.89% | +12.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.67% | -33.89% | -13.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.05% | -1.73% | -14.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -8.64% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 9.47% | -2.68% |
Volatility
NFTY vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) is 3.71%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that NFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFTY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 7.82% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 22.45% | -9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 25.73% | -11.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 25.25% | -7.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.65% | 23.62% | -2.97% |
NFTY vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFTY vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than CIBR's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.42% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.93% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFTY and CIBR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to NFTY (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFTY dropped -47.67% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.55% vs 7.54% for NFTY. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.55% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.42% for CIBR.
NFTY is categorized as India Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFTY and 0.60% for CIBR.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFTY and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer