NFRX vs. XLU
NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. NFRX is actively managed, while XLU is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NFRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
NFRX vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFRX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLU
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
NFRX vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.68% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRX and XLU is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRX vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
NFRX
XLU
NFRX vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFRX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.40 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
NFRX vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -51.98% | +44.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -7.30% | +3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -10.22% | +7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility
NFRX vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 14.57% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 17.32% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 19.25% | -4.94% |
NFRX vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFRX vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than XLU's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.71% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRX and XLU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.22% for NFRX.
They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.08% for XLU.
Find the right allocation for NFRX and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer