NFRX vs. POWR
NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) and POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. NFRX is actively managed, while POWR is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NFRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for POWR.
Performance
NFRX vs. POWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFRX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- YTD
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 15.69%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
NFRX vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 9.03% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 9.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRX and POWR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRX vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank
NFRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
POWR
NFRX vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFRX | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFRX vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and POWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRX | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -65.98% | +58.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -4.01% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -18.04% | +15.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility
NFRX vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRX | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 16.83% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 23.03% | -9.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 25.49% | -11.66% |
NFRX vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than POWR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFRX vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison
NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than POWR's 5.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 5.58% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRX and POWR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.58%, compared with 0.98% for NFRX.
They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.40% for POWR.
Find the right allocation for NFRX and POWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer