PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFRX vs. POWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFRX vs. POWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NFRX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POWR

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
18.53%
6M
15.28%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFRX vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NFRX and POWR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFRX vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFRX

POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFRX vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NFRX vs. POWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFRXPOWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.19

+0.90

Drawdowns

NFRX vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRX drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRX and POWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFRXPOWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-65.98%

+58.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-1.45%

-3.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-18.15%

+15.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

Volatility

NFRX vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFRXPOWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

16.65%

-2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

23.08%

-8.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.36%

25.62%

-11.26%

NFRX vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than POWR's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFRX vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison

NFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than POWR's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFRX
Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF
0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
6.67%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFRX and POWR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.22% for NFRX.

They also come from different issuers: Harrison Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFRX and 0.40% for POWR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFRX and POWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer