NFRA vs. QDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFRA (FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund) and QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NFRA is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while QDF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NFRA returned 7.17%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for QDF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NFRA charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDF.

Performance

NFRA vs. QDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than QDF's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, NFRA has underperformed QDF with an annualized return of 7.17%, while QDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.

NFRA

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 8.93%
• 6M: 9.67%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: 12.91%
• 5Y*: 5.56%
• 10Y*: 7.17%

QDF

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 4.60%
• YTD: 10.70%
• 6M: 10.82%
• 1Y: 27.64%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: 11.90%
• 10Y*: 12.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFRA vs. QDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund	8.93%	18.42%	4.76%	8.96%	-10.11%	9.61%	2.24%	26.27%	-7.74%	15.92%
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund	10.70%	16.58%	16.95%	19.71%	-12.13%	26.65%	4.86%	25.71%	-7.97%	17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NFRA and QDF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013	0.77

The correlation between NFRA and QDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NFRA vs. QDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFRA	QDF
Industrials	25.9%	8.9%
Utilities	25.0%	2.1%
Communication Services	21.8%	6.8%
Energy	11.6%	0.9%
Real Estate	4.7%	5.4%
Healthcare	3.6%	8.3%
Technology	1.8%	38.3%
Financial Services	0.7%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	5.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

NFRA vs. QDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFRA

NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 37
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 35
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 38

QDF

QDF Risk / Return Rank: 73
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFRA vs. QDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFRA	QDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.40	-1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.36	-1.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	3.52	-1.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.01	15.37	-9.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NFRA vs. QDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the QDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFRA and QDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFRA	QDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	2.40	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.77	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.70	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.78	-0.30

Drawdowns

NFRA vs. QDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum QDF drawdown of -36.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and QDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFRA	QDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-36.67%	+4.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-7.90%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.15%	-18.01%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	-22.06%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.49%	-36.67%	+4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-0.56%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.53%	-3.65%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	1.80%	+0.47%

Volatility

NFRA vs. QDF - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) at 2.95%. This indicates that NFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFRA	QDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	2.95%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	8.76%	-0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	11.60%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	15.60%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.97%	17.39%	-2.42%

NFRA vs. QDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than QDF's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFRA vs. QDF - Dividend Comparison

NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than QDF's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund	5.54%	6.00%	3.33%	2.57%	2.28%	2.71%	2.22%	2.27%	3.06%	2.81%	2.98%	2.47%
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund	1.50%	1.65%	1.93%	2.19%	2.45%	1.90%	2.38%	3.05%	4.29%	2.70%	3.07%	3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFRA and QDF in my portfolio?

NFRA and QDF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFRA or QDF?

NFRA has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to QDF (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs QDF's -36.67%.

Which ETF is better, NFRA or QDF?

On 10-year performance, QDF leads with 12.18% vs 7.17% for NFRA. On fees, QDF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, QDF has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFRA or QDF?

Over the 10-year period, QDF has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFRA or QDF?

QDF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for NFRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFRA or QDF?

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.50% for QDF.

What is the main difference between NFRA and QDF?

NFRA is categorized as Utilities Equities, while QDF is Large Cap Value Equities. NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for NFRA and 0.37% for QDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.