PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFRA vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFRA vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 29.16% return. Over the past 10 years, NFRA has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 7.32%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 20.50% annualized return.


NFRA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
7.65%
6M
8.49%
1Y
13.52%
3Y*
12.38%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
7.32%

GRID

1D
1.46%
1M
2.61%
YTD
29.16%
6M
28.54%
1Y
50.38%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
18.03%
10Y*
20.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFRA vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
7.65%18.42%4.76%8.96%-10.11%9.61%2.24%26.27%-7.74%15.92%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
29.16%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NFRA and GRID is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2013

0.60

The correlation between NFRA and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NFRA vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NFRA
GRID

Industrials

26.8%
24.2%

Utilities

24.7%
3.9%

Communication Services

20.5%

-

Energy

11.7%
1.6%

Real Estate

4.7%

-

Healthcare

4.1%

-

Technology

1.6%
12.5%

Financial Services

0.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Industrials

NFRA
26.8%
GRID
24.2%

Utilities

NFRA
24.7%
GRID
3.9%

Communication Services

NFRA
20.5%
GRID

-

Energy

NFRA
11.7%
GRID
1.6%

Real Estate

NFRA
4.7%
GRID

-

Healthcare

NFRA
4.1%
GRID

-

Technology

NFRA
1.6%
GRID
12.5%

Financial Services

NFRA
0.7%
GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

NFRA
0.3%
GRID
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

NFRA
0.1%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

NFRA

-

GRID
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFRA vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFRA
NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFRA vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFRAGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

4.32

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.79

15.44

-9.65

NFRA vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFRA and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFRA vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFRAGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-40.56%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-11.73%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-20.77%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-29.64%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

-40.56%

+8.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-1.14%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-8.42%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

3.27%

-0.93%

Volatility

NFRA vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) is 3.13%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that NFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFRAGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

9.03%

-5.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

17.61%

-9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

20.79%

-10.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

21.27%

-8.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

22.87%

-7.90%

NFRA vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFRA vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than GRID's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.76%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
5.75%6.00%3.33%2.57%2.28%2.71%2.22%2.27%3.06%2.81%2.98%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFRA and GRID have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to NFRA (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 20.50% vs 7.32% for NFRA. On fees, NFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 20.50% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.76% for GRID.

NFRA is categorized as Utilities Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for NFRA and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFRA and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer