NFRA vs. PAVE
NFRA (FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFRA is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NFRA returned 5.77%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for PAVE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.47% expense ratio.
Performance
NFRA vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 23.96% return.
NFRA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 13.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 23.96%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 42.46%
- 3Y*
- 26.32%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- —
NFRA vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 7.65% | 18.42% | 4.76% | 8.96% | -10.11% | 9.61% | 2.24% | 26.27% | -7.74% | 11.39% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 23.96% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRA and PAVE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between NFRA and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NFRA vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NFRA
PAVE
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
NFRA
PAVE
Utilities
NFRA
PAVE
Communication Services
NFRA
PAVE
-
Energy
NFRA
PAVE
Real Estate
NFRA
PAVE
-
Healthcare
NFRA
PAVE
-
Technology
NFRA
PAVE
Financial Services
NFRA
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
NFRA
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
NFRA
PAVE
Basic Materials
NFRA
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFRA vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
NFRA
PAVE
NFRA vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFRA | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 3.58 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 13.03 | -7.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFRA vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRA | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -44.08% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -11.91% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.15% | -26.23% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -26.23% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | 0.00% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -6.21% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 3.27% | -0.93% |
Volatility
NFRA vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) is 3.13%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that NFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFRA | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 6.41% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 15.70% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 19.50% | -8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 21.64% | -8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 24.39% | -9.42% |
NFRA vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NFRA and PAVE have an expense ratio of 0.47%.
Dividends
NFRA vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than PAVE's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.75% | 6.00% | 3.33% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.71% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 2.47% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.74% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFRA and PAVE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to NFRA (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 19.28% vs 5.77% for NFRA. Both ETFs have the same 0.47% expense ratio. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 19.28% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFRA and PAVE have the same expense ratio: 0.47% per year.
NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.74% for PAVE.
NFRA is categorized as Utilities Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Global X.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFRA and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer