NFRA vs. IGF
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF).
NFRA and IGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NFRA is a passively managed fund by FlexShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2013. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. Both NFRA and IGF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NFRA or IGF.
Correlation
The correlation between NFRA and IGF is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NFRA vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NFRA:
1.15
IGF:
2.28
NFRA:
1.61
IGF:
3.06
NFRA:
1.20
IGF:
1.40
NFRA:
1.31
IGF:
2.74
NFRA:
3.70
IGF:
12.84
NFRA:
3.24%
IGF:
2.10%
NFRA:
10.45%
IGF:
11.81%
NFRA:
-32.49%
IGF:
-58.33%
NFRA:
-3.93%
IGF:
-1.24%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 3.62% return. Over the past 10 years, NFRA has underperformed IGF with an annualized return of 4.77%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.61% annualized return.
NFRA
4.09%
2.66%
1.26%
10.09%
2.87%
4.77%
IGF
3.62%
-0.13%
6.31%
24.55%
4.58%
5.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NFRA vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NFRA vs. IGF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NFRA
IGF
NFRA vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NFRA vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than IGF's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 3.20% | 3.33% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.71% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 2.47% | 3.01% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.10% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.24% | 3.00% |
Drawdowns
NFRA vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and IGF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NFRA vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) is 3.04%, while iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that NFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.