PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFRA vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFRA vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 18.25% return. Over the past 10 years, NFRA has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 7.32%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.61% annualized return.


NFRA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
7.65%
6M
8.49%
1Y
13.52%
3Y*
12.38%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
7.32%

COPX

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.85%
YTD
18.25%
6M
19.75%
1Y
108.10%
3Y*
34.51%
5Y*
20.78%
10Y*
21.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFRA vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
7.65%18.42%4.76%8.96%-10.11%9.61%2.24%26.27%-7.74%15.92%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
18.25%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NFRA and COPX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2013

0.53

The correlation between NFRA and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

NFRA vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NFRA
COPX

Industrials

26.8%
3.3%

Utilities

24.7%

-

Communication Services

20.5%

-

Energy

11.7%

-

Real Estate

4.7%

-

Healthcare

4.1%

-

Technology

1.6%

-

Financial Services

0.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

96.7%

Industrials

NFRA
26.8%
COPX
3.3%

Utilities

NFRA
24.7%
COPX

-

Communication Services

NFRA
20.5%
COPX

-

Energy

NFRA
11.7%
COPX

-

Real Estate

NFRA
4.7%
COPX

-

Healthcare

NFRA
4.1%
COPX

-

Technology

NFRA
1.6%
COPX

-

Financial Services

NFRA
0.7%
COPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

NFRA
0.3%
COPX

-

Consumer Defensive

NFRA
0.1%
COPX

-

Basic Materials

NFRA

-

COPX
96.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFRA vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFRA
NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFRA vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFRACOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.91

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.79

11.97

-6.18

NFRA vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFRA and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFRA vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and COPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFRACOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-83.16%

+50.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-27.82%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-39.72%

+28.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-42.12%

+19.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

-65.41%

+32.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-11.30%

+8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-39.24%

+34.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

9.06%

-6.72%

Volatility

NFRA vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) is 3.13%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 17.85%. This indicates that NFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFRACOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

17.85%

-14.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

38.53%

-30.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

44.00%

-33.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

36.93%

-23.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

35.76%

-20.79%

NFRA vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFRA vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than COPX's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.26%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
5.75%6.00%3.33%2.57%2.28%2.71%2.22%2.27%3.06%2.81%2.98%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFRA and COPX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COPX has higher volatility (17.85%) compared to NFRA (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFRA dropped -32.49% vs COPX's -83.16%.

On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.61% vs 7.32% for NFRA. On fees, NFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.61% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 2.26% for COPX.

NFRA is categorized as Utilities Equities, while COPX is Copper. NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for NFRA and 0.65% for COPX.

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFRA and COPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer