NFRA vs. ECLN
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN).
NFRA and ECLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NFRA is a passively managed fund by FlexShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2013. ECLN is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 19, 2019.
Performance
NFRA vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NFRA vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.94% | 18.42% | 4.76% | 8.96% | -10.11% | 9.61% | 2.24% | 7.82% |
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 13.60% | 16.78% | 22.60% | -3.36% | 5.28% | 12.26% | 8.98% | 5.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFRA achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly lower than ECLN's 13.60% return.
NFRA
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- 1Y
- 17.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
ECLN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NFRA vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NFRA vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank
NFRA
ECLN
NFRA vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFRA | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.91 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 2.52 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.00 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 12.68 | -4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFRA | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.91 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.89 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.70 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between NFRA and ECLN is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NFRA vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison
NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than ECLN's 1.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.69% | 6.00% | 3.33% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.71% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 2.47% |
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.80% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NFRA vs. ECLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFRA drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, roughly equal to the maximum ECLN drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFRA and ECLN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFRA | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -32.28% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.84% | -8.45% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -19.88% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -0.89% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -5.08% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.00% | +0.12% |
Volatility
NFRA vs. ECLN - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) at 2.87%. This indicates that NFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NFRA | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 2.87% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 7.36% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.55% | 12.78% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 14.16% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 17.52% | -2.56% |