NFLX vs. MAR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) and MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) are both stocks. NFLX operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while MAR operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, NFLX returned 23.92%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for MAR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NFLX vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 30.26% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has outperformed MAR with an annualized return of 23.92%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively lower 21.03% annualized return.

NFLX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -7.59%
• YTD: -14.31%
• 6M: -15.60%
• 1Y: -33.72%
• 3Y*: 22.62%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 23.92%

MAR

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 14.11%
• YTD: 30.26%
• 6M: 35.28%
• 1Y: 59.26%
• 3Y*: 31.68%
• 5Y*: 23.91%
• 10Y*: 21.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLX vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NFLX Netflix, Inc.	-14.31%	5.19%	83.07%	65.11%	-51.05%	11.41%	67.11%	20.89%	39.44%	55.06%
MAR Marriott International, Inc.	30.26%	12.31%	24.92%	53.06%	-9.34%	25.26%	-12.53%	41.49%	-19.05%	66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLX and MAR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002	0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between NFLX and MAR has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS NFLX : $3.09 MAR : $12.66
PE Ratio NFLX : 25.99 MAR : 31.80
PEG Ratio NFLX : 1.03 MAR : 0.83
PS Ratio NFLX : 7.41 MAR : 3.78
Total Revenue (TTM) NFLX : $46.89B MAR : $21.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) NFLX : $22.99B MAR : $1.31B
EBITDA (TTM) NFLX : $26.91B MAR : $3.81B

Return for Risk

NFLX vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLX

NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 8
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

MAR

MAR Risk / Return Rank: 89
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLX vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLX	MAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	2.07	-3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.46	3.04	-4.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.35	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	4.31	-5.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	10.89	-12.23

NFLX vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLX Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLX and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLX vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and MAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLX	MAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.99%	-75.59%	-6.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.35%	-12.65%	-30.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.35%	-30.50%	-12.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.95%	-30.50%	-45.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.95%	-61.26%	-14.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.01%	0.00%	-40.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.91%	-14.90%	-10.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.19%	5.01%	+20.18%

Volatility

NFLX vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 5.85%, while Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLX	MAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	6.92%	-1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.58%	19.94%	+4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.05%	26.32%	+6.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.09%	28.84%	+14.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.49%	32.90%	+8.59%

Dividends

NFLX vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAR Marriott International, Inc.	0.68%	0.85%	0.86%	0.87%	0.67%	0.00%	0.36%	1.22%	1.44%	0.95%	1.39%	1.42%
NFLX Netflix, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLX and MAR in my portfolio?

NFLX and MAR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLX or MAR?

MAR has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs MAR's -75.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.