PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLP vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLP vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NFLP having a -31.18% return and HODL slightly lower at -31.58%.


NFLP

1D
-3.69%
1M
-23.02%
YTD
-31.18%
6M
-30.98%
1Y
-49.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HODL

1D
-3.97%
1M
-21.08%
YTD
-31.58%
6M
-31.41%
1Y
-43.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLP vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NFLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF
-31.18%-1.54%55.49%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-31.58%-6.42%91.50%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLP and HODL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLP vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLP
NFLP Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
NFLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLP Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLP Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLP vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLPHODLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

0.84

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.83

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.86

-1.42

-0.45

NFLP vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLP Sharpe Ratio is -1.45, which is lower than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLP and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLP vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -50.88%, roughly equal to the maximum HODL drawdown of -52.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and HODL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLPHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.88%

-52.32%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.88%

-52.32%

+1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.88%

-52.32%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.45%

-16.84%

+6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.66%

30.66%

-4.00%

Volatility

NFLP vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) is 9.22%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that NFLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLPHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

13.35%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.05%

34.55%

-6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.35%

44.27%

-9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.14%

49.92%

-20.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.14%

49.92%

-20.78%

NFLP vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLP vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.82%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF
30.82%26.56%19.87%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLP and HODL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HODL has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to NFLP (9.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLP dropped -50.88% vs HODL's -52.32%.

On 1-year performance, HODL leads with -43.43% vs -49.63% for NFLP. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NFLP has been the lower-risk option at 9.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HODL has performed better with a -43.43% return vs -49.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLP.

NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 30.82%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

NFLP is categorized as Derivative Income, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLP and 0.25% for HODL.

HODL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.99 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLP and HODL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer