NFLP vs. QQQI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLP returned -44.63% vs 22.03% for QQQI. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

NFLP vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLP achieves a -27.82% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 10.40% return.

NFLP

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -9.48%
• 6M: -24.15%
• YTD: -27.82%
• 1Y: -44.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 8.70%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 1Y: 22.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLP vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF	-27.82%	-1.54%	36.79%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.40%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLP and QQQI is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between NFLP and QQQI has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NFLP vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLP

NFLP Risk / Return Rank: 0
NFLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
NFLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLP Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLP Martin Ratio Rank: 0

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 56
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLP vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLP	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.27	1.44	-2.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.98	1.96	-3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.27	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	2.30	-3.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.74	9.51	-11.26

NFLP vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLP Sharpe Ratio is -1.27, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLP and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLP vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLP	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.68%	-20.00%	-30.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.16%	-9.61%	-38.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.49%	-2.84%	-45.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.11%	-2.21%	-8.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.62%	2.32%	+23.30%

Volatility

NFLP vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 7.43%. This indicates that NFLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLP	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.22%	7.43%	+5.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.40%	12.76%	+16.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.34%	15.44%	+19.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.44%	17.60%	+11.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.44%	17.60%	+11.84%

NFLP vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLP vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.51%, more than QQQI's 13.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF	28.51%	26.56%	19.87%	3.21%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.76%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLP and QQQI in my portfolio?

NFLP and QQQI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLP or QQQI?

NFLP has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to QQQI (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLP dropped -50.68% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, NFLP or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 22.03% vs -44.63% for NFLP. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLP or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 22.03% return vs -44.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLP or QQQI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLP or QQQI?

NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 28.51%, compared with 13.76% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between NFLP and QQQI?

NFLP is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLP and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.