NETL vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NETL is a REIT fund tracking the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NETL returned 11.59% vs 41.42% for NUKZ. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NETL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

NETL vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 13.31% return.

NETL

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 11.59%
• 3Y*: 7.12%
• 5Y*: 1.33%
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 41.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NETL vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF	10.34%	6.05%	4.13%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	13.31%	56.57%	62.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NETL and NUKZ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.12

NETL vs. NUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NETL	NUKZ
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	12.9%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	45.9%
Technology	-	1.4%
Utilities	-	35.8%

Return for Risk

NETL vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NETL

NETL Risk / Return Rank: 25
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 29

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 40
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NETL vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NETL	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.40	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	2.02	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.23	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	2.52	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.99	6.34	-2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NETL vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NETL and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NETL	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	1.40	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	1.75	-1.56

Drawdowns

NETL vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NETL	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.48%	-33.03%	-18.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-16.51%	+7.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	-5.61%	+1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.65%	-6.01%	-5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	6.55%	-3.64%

Volatility

NETL vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) is 3.66%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that NETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NETL	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	10.30%	-6.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	22.05%	-12.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	29.74%	-16.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.94%	32.70%	-14.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.92%	32.70%	-6.78%

NETL vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

NETL vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than NUKZ's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF	4.83%	5.12%	5.08%	4.57%	4.47%	4.03%	3.98%	2.52%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.80%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NETL and NUKZ in my portfolio?

NETL and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NETL or NUKZ?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, NETL or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, NUKZ leads with 41.42% vs 11.59% for NETL. On fees, NETL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NETL or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, NUKZ has performed better with a 41.42% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NETL or NUKZ?

NETL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NETL or NUKZ?

NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.80% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between NETL and NUKZ?

NETL is categorized as REIT, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.