PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NETL vs. SCHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NETL vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NETL having a 17.65% return and SCHH slightly higher at 17.68%.


NETL

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.11%
6M
11.40%
YTD
17.65%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.71%

SCHH

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.87%
6M
14.82%
YTD
17.68%
1Y
19.86%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
3.73%
ALL TIME*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$185.70K$225.02K$291.53K
$134.76M$145.46M$140.74M

NETL vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
17.65%6.05%-1.08%2.69%-16.16%27.36%-0.73%12.04%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
17.68%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NETL and SCHH is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.88

The correlation between NETL and SCHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NETL vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NETL
NETL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NETL vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NETLSCHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.37

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

7.96

-0.79

NETL vs. SCHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NETL Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SCHH Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NETL and SCHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NETL vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than SCHH's maximum drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and SCHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NETLSCHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.48%

-44.22%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.28%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-17.76%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-33.28%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-2.33%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.42%

-9.36%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.47%

+0.36%

Volatility

NETL vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison

NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) at 4.56%. This indicates that NETL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NETLSCHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

4.56%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

10.96%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

13.92%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.02%

18.79%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.77%

21.03%

+4.74%

NETL vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NETL vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison

NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than SCHH's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
4.61%5.12%5.08%4.57%4.47%4.03%3.98%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.72%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NETL and SCHH have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NETL has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to SCHH (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs SCHH's -44.22%.

On 5-year performance, SCHH leads with 3.28% vs 1.78% for NETL. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHH has performed better with a 3.28% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.

NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 2.72% for SCHH.

NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.07% for SCHH.

NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NETL and SCHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer