NETL vs. SRET
NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) and SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index while SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NETL returned 1.88%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for SRET. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NETL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SRET.
Performance
NETL vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NETL achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's 5.39% return.
NETL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 6M
- 12.28%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- —
SRET
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- 1.07%
NETL vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 12.00% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 12.04% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 5.39% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 10.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NETL and SRET is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between NETL and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NETL vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
NETL
SRET
NETL vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NETL | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 1.64 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 6.77 | -2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NETL vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NETL drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NETL and SRET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NETL | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -66.98% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -9.48% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -18.87% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -29.43% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -23.02% | +19.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.58% | -22.48% | +10.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.30% | +0.64% |
Volatility
NETL vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.72%. This indicates that NETL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NETL | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 3.72% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 9.15% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 11.54% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 16.49% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 24.60% | +1.27% |
NETL vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
NETL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
NETL vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
NETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than SRET's 7.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.76% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.99% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NETL and SRET have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NETL has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to SRET (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NETL dropped -51.48% vs SRET's -66.98%.
On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.88% vs 1.69% for SRET. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.88% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.99%, compared with 4.76% for NETL.
NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index, while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NETL and 0.58% for SRET.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NETL and SRET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer