NERD vs. BABW
NERD (Roundhill Video Games ETF) and BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NERD is a Gaming fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NERD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BABW.
Performance
NERD vs. BABW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NERD achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly higher than BABW's -28.96% return.
NERD
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- 6M
- -14.09%
- YTD
- -14.16%
- 1Y
- -17.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- -6.41%
- 10Y*
- —
BABW
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -31.16%
- YTD
- -28.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NERD vs. BABW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NERD Roundhill Video Games ETF | -14.16% | -9.63% |
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -28.96% | -16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NERD and BABW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NERD vs. BABW — Risk / Return Rank
NERD
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NERD vs. BABW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) and Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NERD | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NERD vs. BABW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NERD drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than BABW's maximum drawdown of -54.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NERD and BABW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NERD | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -54.76% | -10.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.32% | -44.92% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.02% | -25.58% | -10.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.17% | — | — |
Volatility
NERD vs. BABW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NERD | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.83% | 50.55% | -30.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 50.55% | -25.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 50.55% | -25.11% |
NERD vs. BABW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NERD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BABW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NERD vs. BABW - Dividend Comparison
NERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than BABW's 48.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 48.09% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NERD Roundhill Video Games ETF | 0.73% | 0.63% | 1.74% | 1.07% | 0.69% | 0.02% | 1.05% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NERD and BABW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NERD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NERD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 48.09%, compared with 0.73% for NERD.
NERD is categorized as Gaming, while BABW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NERD and 0.99% for BABW.
Find the right allocation for NERD and BABW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer