NERD vs. BABW
NERD (Roundhill Video Games ETF) and BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NERD is a Gaming fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NERD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BABW.
Performance
NERD vs. BABW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NERD achieves a -11.43% return, which is significantly higher than BABW's -17.95% return.
NERD
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- 6M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -11.43%
- 1Y
- -14.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- -4.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.99%
BABW
- 1D
- 4.66%
- 1M
- 38.27%
- 6M
- -30.25%
- YTD
- -17.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $94.03K | $69.08K | $57.32K | |
| $26.49K | $27.10K | $40.58K |
NERD vs. BABW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NERD Roundhill Video Games ETF | -11.43% | -9.63% |
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -17.95% | -16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NERD and BABW is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NERD vs. BABW — Risk / Return Rank
NERD
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NERD vs. BABW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) and Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NERD | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NERD vs. BABW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NERD drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than BABW's maximum drawdown of -54.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NERD and BABW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NERD | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -54.76% | -10.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.55% | -36.38% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.09% | -26.97% | -9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.38% | — | — |
Volatility
NERD vs. BABW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NERD | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 50.55% | -29.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 50.55% | -25.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 50.55% | -25.09% |
NERD vs. BABW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NERD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BABW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NERD vs. BABW - Dividend Comparison
NERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than BABW's 46.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 46.50% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NERD Roundhill Video Games ETF | 0.71% | 0.63% | 1.74% | 1.07% | 0.69% | 0.02% | 1.05% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NERD and BABW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NERD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NERD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 46.50%, compared with 0.71% for NERD.
NERD is categorized as Gaming, while BABW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NERD and 0.99% for BABW.
Find the right allocation for NERD and BABW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer