PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEO.TO vs. TMRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEO.TO vs. TMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NEO.TO is traded in CAD, while TMRC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TMRC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEO.TO achieves a 155.02% return, which is significantly higher than TMRC's 16.68% return.


NEO.TO

1D
0.77%
1M
12.31%
6M
112.65%
YTD
155.02%
1Y
136.29%
3Y*
72.18%
5Y*
22.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.68%

TMRC

1D
3.95%
1M
-21.79%
6M
-14.03%
YTD
16.68%
1Y
-9.79%
3Y*
-11.74%
5Y*
-13.42%
10Y*
16.82%
ALL TIME*
14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEO.TO vs. TMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
155.02%101.35%10.42%-16.66%-51.09%50.37%16.30%-17.14%-12.01%2.46%
TMRC
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp
16.68%133.57%-36.91%-67.80%-29.64%11.24%40.49%377.45%27.51%37.58%

Correlation

The correlation between NEO.TO and TMRC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017

0.09

Over the past year, NEO.TO and TMRC have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEO.TO:

CA$1.65B

TMRC:

$61.40M

EPS

NEO.TO:

-$0.24

TMRC:

-$0.04

PB Ratio

NEO.TO:

3.05

TMRC:

20.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$511.45M

TMRC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$147.42M

TMRC:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$61.97M

TMRC:

-$2.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEO.TO vs. TMRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO.TO
NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TMRC
TMRC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TMRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMRC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TMRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMRC Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEO.TO vs. TMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEO.TOTMRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.14

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

-0.13

+4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

-0.16

+8.77

NEO.TO vs. TMRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the TMRC Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO.TO and TMRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEO.TO vs. TMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.44%, smaller than the maximum TMRC drawdown of -95.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO.TO and TMRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEO.TOTMRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.44%

-95.04%

+22.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.83%

-77.82%

+44.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.56%

-79.73%

+42.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.44%

-90.64%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.70%

-83.20%

+72.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-54.46%

+19.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.90%

59.91%

-44.01%

Volatility

NEO.TO vs. TMRC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) is 17.28%, while Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) has a volatility of 18.36%. This indicates that NEO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEO.TOTMRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.28%

18.36%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.68%

86.30%

-39.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.49%

154.04%

-88.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.68%

109.12%

-55.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.47%

109.46%

-56.99%

Dividends

NEO.TO vs. TMRC - Dividend Comparison

NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while TMRC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1.02%2.57%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%3.20%2.47%
TMRC
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NEO.TO vs. TMRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
152.42M
0
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
(TMRC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NEO.TO and TMRC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEO.TO and TMRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer