PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEO.TO vs. ARRNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NEO.TO is traded in CAD, while ARRNF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARRNF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEO.TO achieves a 155.02% return, which is significantly higher than ARRNF's 25.01% return.


NEO.TO

1D
0.77%
1M
12.31%
6M
112.65%
YTD
155.02%
1Y
136.29%
3Y*
72.18%
5Y*
22.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.68%

ARRNF

1D
1.77%
1M
-5.56%
6M
-7.45%
YTD
25.01%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
31.50%
5Y*
70.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
48.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
155.02%101.35%10.42%-16.66%-51.09%50.37%65.41%
ARRNF
American Rare Earths Limited
25.01%18.24%53.21%-13.71%11.04%549.68%-24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NEO.TO and ARRNF is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2020

0.13

The correlation between NEO.TO and ARRNF shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEO.TO:

CA$1.65B

ARRNF:

$148.47M

EPS

NEO.TO:

-$0.24

ARRNF:

-A$0.02

PB Ratio

NEO.TO:

3.05

ARRNF:

4.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$511.45M

ARRNF:

-A$128.85K

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$147.42M

ARRNF:

-A$385.87K

EBITDA (TTM)

NEO.TO:

$61.97M

ARRNF:

-A$12.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO.TO
NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ARRNF
ARRNF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ARRNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARRNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARRNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ARRNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARRNF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEO.TOARRNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.14

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

0.07

+4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

0.09

+8.52

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the ARRNF Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO.TO and ARRNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.44%, smaller than the maximum ARRNF drawdown of -81.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO.TO and ARRNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEO.TOARRNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.44%

-81.55%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.83%

-69.80%

+36.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.56%

-69.80%

+32.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.44%

-81.55%

+9.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.70%

-62.25%

+51.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-45.46%

+10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.90%

53.69%

-37.79%

Volatility

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF - Volatility Comparison

Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) at 10.70%. This indicates that NEO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARRNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEO.TOARRNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.28%

10.70%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.68%

42.35%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.49%

119.37%

-53.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.68%

311.73%

-258.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.47%

284.60%

-232.13%

Dividends

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF - Dividend Comparison

NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while ARRNF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ARRNF
American Rare Earths Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1.02%2.57%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%3.20%2.47%

Financials

NEO.TO vs. ARRNF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Neo Performance Materials Inc. and American Rare Earths Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
152.42M
0
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
(ARRNF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NEO.TO values in USD, ARRNF values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


NEO.TO and ARRNF have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEO.TO and ARRNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer