PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDSN vs. CL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NDSN vs. CL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nordson Corporation (NDSN) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDSN achieves a 17.74% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, NDSN has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 13.93%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.


NDSN

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
17.74%
6M
21.16%
1Y
33.24%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
13.93%

CL

1D
-2.83%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
10.27%
6M
14.49%
1Y
-2.21%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDSN vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDSN
Nordson Corporation
17.74%17.03%-20.15%12.39%-5.93%28.09%24.45%37.88%-17.65%31.83%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
10.27%-10.98%16.57%3.78%-5.44%2.08%27.17%18.60%-19.19%17.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NDSN and CL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NDSN:

$15.84B

CL:

$69.29B

EPS

NDSN:

$9.36

CL:

$2.58

PE Ratio

NDSN:

30.15

CL:

33.37

PEG Ratio

NDSN:

11.82

CL:

8.62

PS Ratio

NDSN:

5.48

CL:

3.35

PB Ratio

NDSN:

4.95

CL:

477.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

NDSN:

$2.90B

CL:

$20.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NDSN:

$1.60B

CL:

$12.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

NDSN:

$744.50M

CL:

$3.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDSN vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDSN
NDSN Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NDSN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDSN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDSN Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NDSN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDSN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CL
CL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDSN vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nordson Corporation (NDSN) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDSNCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.00

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

-0.12

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

-0.20

+7.77

NDSN vs. CL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDSN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the CL Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDSN and CL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDSNCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

-0.10

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.17

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.21

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.42

-0.05

Drawdowns

NDSN vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDSN drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDSN and CL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDSNCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.62%

-58.91%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-18.64%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.15%

-29.05%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.15%

-29.05%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.24%

-29.05%

-15.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.42%

-17.54%

+12.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-11.24%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

11.29%

-6.89%

Volatility

NDSN vs. CL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is 6.53%, while Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that NDSN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDSNCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

7.77%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

17.27%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.84%

21.67%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.66%

18.77%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.43%

19.74%

+8.69%

Dividends

NDSN vs. CL - Dividend Comparison

NDSN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than CL's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.43%2.61%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%
NDSN
Nordson Corporation
1.15%1.66%1.02%1.01%0.98%0.71%0.77%0.90%1.09%0.78%0.91%1.43%

Financials

NDSN vs. CL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nordson Corporation and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
740.85M
5.32B
(NDSN) Total Revenue
(CL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NDSN vs. CL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nordson Corporation and Colgate-Palmolive Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%62.0%20222023202420252026
54.5%
60.6%
Portfolio components
NDSN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordson Corporation reported a gross profit of 404.08M and revenue of 740.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.5%.

CL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

NDSN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordson Corporation reported an operating income of 197.20M and revenue of 740.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

CL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.

NDSN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordson Corporation reported a net income of 117.32M and revenue of 740.85M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.

CL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NDSN and CL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CL has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to NDSN (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDSN dropped -73.62% vs CL's -58.91%.

NDSN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDSN and CL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer