NDOW vs. BPH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NDOW (Anydrus Advantage ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDOW is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Anydrus Capital, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NDOW charges 2.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

NDOW vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NDOW

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -0.89%
• 6M: 2.89%
• YTD: 5.73%
• 1Y: 13.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDOW vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	-0.92%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NDOW and BPH is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.02

Return for Risk

NDOW vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDOW

NDOW Risk / Return Rank: 50
NDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
NDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 52
NDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDOW vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDOW	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.32	—	—

Drawdowns

NDOW vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDOW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDOW and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDOW	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-15.58%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	-6.78%	+3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-6.73%	+5.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NDOW	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.67%	28.00%	-18.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.07%	28.00%	-18.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.07%	28.00%	-18.93%

NDOW vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDOW has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDOW vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

NDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than BPH's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	1.17%	1.24%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDOW and BPH in my portfolio?

NDOW and BPH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NDOW or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDOW or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDOW or BPH?

NDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.52% for BPH.

What is the main difference between NDOW and BPH?

NDOW is categorized as Global Allocation, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Anydrus Capital and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 2.15% for NDOW and 0.19% for BPH.