NCIQ vs. DIVB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NCIQ (Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF) and DIVB (iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NCIQ is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price™ Index, while DIVB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NCIQ returned -36.98% vs 31.43% for DIVB. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

NCIQ vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -26.10% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 18.01% return.

NCIQ

• 1D: -5.72%
• 1M: -14.26%
• YTD: -26.10%
• 6M: -29.48%
• 1Y: -36.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVB

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 8.21%
• YTD: 18.01%
• 6M: 20.03%
• 1Y: 31.43%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCIQ vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF	-26.10%	-10.21%
DIVB iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF	18.01%	9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NCIQ and DIVB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

NCIQ vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCIQ

NCIQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
NCIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NCIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NCIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NCIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
NCIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

DIVB

DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 83
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCIQ vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCIQ	DIVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	2.79	-3.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.01	3.92	-4.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.49	-0.61
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	4.67	-5.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	15.96	-17.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCIQ vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIQ and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCIQ	DIVB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.79	2.79	-3.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.57	0.76	-1.34

Drawdowns

NCIQ vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, which is greater than DIVB's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and DIVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCIQ	DIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.90%	-36.93%	-15.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.90%	-6.82%	-46.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.57%	0.00%	-50.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.76%	-5.00%	-16.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.77%	2.00%	+28.77%

Volatility

NCIQ vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB) at 3.44%. This indicates that NCIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCIQ	DIVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.71%	3.44%	+6.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.14%	8.43%	+28.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.13%	11.32%	+35.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.81%	15.23%	+32.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.81%	18.38%	+29.43%

NCIQ vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NCIQ and DIVB have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NCIQ vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

NCIQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIVB iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF	2.17%	2.50%	2.61%	3.18%	2.02%	1.63%	2.08%	2.07%	2.52%	0.37%
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCIQ and DIVB in my portfolio?

NCIQ and DIVB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCIQ or DIVB?

NCIQ has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to DIVB (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCIQ dropped -52.90% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

Which ETF is better, NCIQ or DIVB?

On 1-year performance, DIVB leads with 31.43% vs -36.98% for NCIQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, DIVB has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NCIQ or DIVB?

Over the 1-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 31.43% return vs -36.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NCIQ or DIVB?

NCIQ and DIVB have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NCIQ or DIVB?

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.00% for NCIQ.

What is the main difference between NCIQ and DIVB?

NCIQ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DIVB is Large Cap Blend Equities. NCIQ tracks Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price™ Index, while DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. They also come from different issuers: Hashdex and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.