NBRFX vs. QQQI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI).

NBRFX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on May 1, 2002. QQQI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jan 29, 2024.

Performance

NBRFX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NBRFX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NBRFX Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund	3.76%	-2.14%	10.40%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	-3.45%	18.62%	19.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBRFX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's -3.45% return.

NBRFX

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -6.07%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: -0.18%
• 3Y*: 5.21%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: 5.68%

QQQI

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: -3.45%
• 6M: -0.97%
• 1Y: 21.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRFX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

NBRFX

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund

QQQI

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

Return for Risk

NBRFX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRFX

NBRFX Risk / Return Rank: 5
NBRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NBRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NBRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NBRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
NBRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRFX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBRFX	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	1.09	-1.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	1.68	-1.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.25	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	1.93	-1.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.22	8.69	-8.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBRFX vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRFX and QQQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBRFX	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	1.09	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.90	-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between NBRFX and QQQI is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NBRFX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

NBRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than QQQI's 14.90% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBRFX Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund	1.95%	2.07%	1.94%	2.11%	12.58%	7.76%	2.03%	4.73%	6.98%	6.43%	14.86%	9.29%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.90%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NBRFX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRFX drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRFX and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBRFX	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.52%	-20.00%	-50.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.34%	-11.46%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.47%	-5.72%	-7.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.85%	-2.31%	-9.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	2.54%	+0.93%

Volatility

NBRFX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) is 4.22%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that NBRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBRFX	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	6.18%	-1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.22%	11.23%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.00%	19.72%	-3.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.78%	17.48%	+2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.34%	17.48%	+2.86%